Hi,
The scenario is: [intercept] squid will forward traffic to Privoxy by
cache_peer directive. But I only want forward some *specific* routing to
Privoxy to the unreachable path, the remain Internet traffic is as
usual. Can it?
Thanks.
On 2/15/2012 7:26 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The key
Hi Squid guys,
We're using Squid 3.2 on Solaris 11 system smoothly, but few days ago
our ISP has had troubles with external Internet routing so we can't
reach many websites. I discovered that if I use Tor's browser I can open
that websites normally (yes, it's slow btw), at least we can open
Hi,
I got many security alerts from Squid that told Host header forgery
detected, part of the log file is here:
https://pastee.org/7vqst
This error happens when users:
1. open google.com on browser and was redirected to local google.com.vn
2. open result links when googling
3. open
Hi Amos,
It's close to holiday but, hope you could know this:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3461
And Merry Christmas to every Squid users!
Best regards,
~ Neddie
Hi,
Today I've got this message from Squid:
You've encountered a fatal error in the Squid Cache version 3.2.0.14.
If a core file was created (possibly in the swap directory),
please execute 'gdb squid core' or 'dbx squid core', then type 'where',
and report the trace back to
Hi there,
I'm building new squid box which is 3.2.0.14 on OpenIndiana 151a, the
configuration is as usual but when squid started up, intercept mode
didn't work.
IP NAT table already works:
# ipnat -l
List of active MAP/Redirect filters:
rdr rtls0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 - 10.2.176.31 port 3129
On 12/20/2011 7:06 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 21/12/2011 12:33 a.m., Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
Hi there,
I'm building new squid box which is 3.2.0.14 on OpenIndiana 151a, the
configuration is as usual but when squid started up, intercept mode
didn't work.
IP NAT table already works:
# ipnat
Hi,
I've deployed a squid box 3.2.0.13 for one branch office, there are 10
users there. It's a small office then I think to use an old computer
Pentium 4 2.4Ghz is enough; and the configuration is intercepting squid
proxy.
The current issue in there is: when someone open a few websites that
Hi Amos,
I'll try 3.2.0.14 soon.
Thanks
On 12/15/11, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 15/12/2011 6:55 p.m., Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
Hi,
I've deployed a squid box 3.2.0.13 for one branch office, there are 10
users there. It's a small office then I think to use an old computer
On 12/7/2011 4:13 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
cc'd to squid-dev so the developers can see this info.
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:43:38 +0700, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
Hi,
I've installed Squid 3.2.0.13 as an intercepting proxy server. Today
I tried to build latest version 3.2.0.13 20111205, the problem
Hi,
I've installed Squid 3.2.0.13 as an intercepting proxy server. Today I
tried to build latest version 3.2.0.13 20111205, the problem is
sometimes I suffer lost connection when downloading, eg. it freezes at
xx% and I have to pause and start to continue, When open some websites,
it's
of the set-up below (with the Squid box the same as
the Gateway)
Internet Router Eth0 |- Squid box Default Gateway -| Eth1
Switch LAN
# Edz.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam nam...@nd24.net wrote:
Hi Amos,
You're right, switch is not really true.
But I still
diagram or illustration shows a difference with my illustration.
If you believe they are the same and getting header fields shown, look
through your firewall and squid acls.
# Edz.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam nam...@nd24.net wrote:
Hi Edmonds,
That's really like my setup
Hi Amos,
You're right, switch is not really true.
But I still can't find the way on Solaris-like system like /proc/sys/net/bridge
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
Like a switch? or or did you really mean like a bridge?
* switch ... no solution.
Hi,
As last time I had a squid box working in interception mode as well:
traffic was redirected from default gateway to squid box, then IP-filter
will NAT to intercepting squid. Look like this:
INTERNET Router
|
|
SwitchDefault gateway
| \
| \
|+ Squid box
|
Hi,
Now, I'd like to have additional Varnish as a cache agent in front of
intercept Squid 3.2 (built successfully before).
Varnish was built with default setting and start up script:
# ./varnishd -a 0.0.0.0:8080 -b 0.0.0.0:3129 -s malloc,512M
Varnish will listen at tcp port 8080 first, if
On 12/1/2011 5:55 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Yes that is packets successfully arriving at squid and HTT request
being processed fine. The intercept flag tells squid to accept
origin server formatted (partial) URLs. Its absence tells Squid to
accept proxy formatted (absolute) URLs.
The
Hi,
I've just installed Squid 3.2 on OpenIndiana 151a server. I have to
build squid 3.2 because I can't build squid 3.1.
I decide to install transparent/interception proxy:
# ./configure --prefix=/usr/squid --enable-ipf-transparent
# make
# make install
Modify in squid.conf with these
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
NP: the whole NAT system underwent an upgrade in 3.1. Portions of it have
not had much testing yet because nobody with non-Linux seems interested or
able to assist with the deep investigations needed.
For starters, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
