On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:25:41AM -0800, Chuck Kollars wrote:
> >> ... My cache is pretty big ...
> >> ... I will lose all that data from months of objects...
>
> Dumb question: is all that stuff really of much value?
>
In some countries where volume charging is applied to data then, yes,
d
> Amos,
>
> I checked all the squid3 directories:
> squid3: /usr/sbin/squid3 /etc/squid3 /usr/lib/squid3 /usr/share/squid3
>
> and didn't find any core.* files. I even did a
>
> /etc/squid3# whereis core
> core: /usr/share/man/man5/core.5.gz
>
> and it didn't find anything significant.
>
> I instal
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 04:00:36 Wilson Hernandez - MSD, S. A. wrote:
> Pieter,
>
> I had to delete my cache. I didn't get any answers from the list and I
> had a lot of people calling.
>
> I did:
> rm -r /squid/cache/*
>
> it took over 30 minutes.
Next time, rename /squid/cache and delete t
ons 2008-12-10 klockan 06:25 -0800 skrev Chuck Kollars:
> Does performance really continue to improve significantly with increasing
> cache size even when the cache is already very very large?
At least up to a month worth of cache growth shows noticeable increases
in hit ratio, both bytes and r
ons 2008-12-10 klockan 00:00 -0400 skrev Wilson Hernandez - MSD, S. A.:
> I then decided to also delete, actually rename, access.log and store.log
> files. This time when I restarted, it worked. I had to do it that way
> because that was the only solution I found. I there is another way to
> re
>> ... My cache is pretty big ...
>> ... I will lose all that data from months of objects...
Dumb question: is all that stuff really of much value?
Does performance really continue to improve significantly with increasing cache
size even when the cache is already very very large?
Isn't the
Amos,
I checked all the squid3 directories:
squid3: /usr/sbin/squid3 /etc/squid3 /usr/lib/squid3 /usr/share/squid3
and didn't find any core.* files. I even did a
/etc/squid3# whereis core
core: /usr/share/man/man5/core.5.gz
and it didn't find anything significant.
I installed squid3 on debian
Wilson Hernandez - MSD, S. A. wrote:
Pieter,
I had to delete my cache. I didn't get any answers from the list and I
had a lot of people calling.
I did:
rm -r /squid/cache/*
it took over 30 minutes.
Then,
restarted squid (/etc/init.d/squid3 start) and it was doing the same: It
started and it
Please try the latest squid. There are many hundreds of bug fixes to 3.0
since PRE5.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE10
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.3 or 3.0.STABLE11-RC1
Pieter,
I had to delete my cache. I didn't get any answers from the list and I
had a lot of people calling.
I did:
rm -r /squid/cache/*
it took over 30 minutes.
Then,
restarted squid (/etc/init.d/squid3 start) and it was doing the same: It
started and it just died without giving any errors.
Well - something is killing it. It got a lot future than before, it stopped
at 0.6% iirc last time ?
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:42:52 -0400, "Wilson Hernandez - MSD, S. A."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That i486 thing just might have been the original kernel. I don't know
> why it says i486.
>
> I
That i486 thing just might have been the original kernel. I don't know
why it says i486.
I ran tail -f /var/log/squid/cache.log and noticed that squid tries to
rebuild the cache, it stops and restarts again:
Store rebuilding is 10.1% complete
I don't want to delete my cache. That's the only
Hi,
Might be totally off here, but I noted your swap size is "large". Could it
be that the cache has more objects (in count and in byte count ?) than can
fit into a 32-bit counter ?
I got to this by seeing that it crashes at the cache rebuild section as
well as the fact the the build is i486.
L
Hello.
I came across something weird. Squid3 just stopped working, just dies
without any error message. My server was running as usual and all over a
sudden users weren't getting internet. I checked if all the normal
processes were running and noticed squid wasn't. Now, I try to start the
server a
14 matches
Mail list logo
