Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-06 Thread Adrian Chadd
Have you asked the videocache group why it functions the way it functions? adrian 2009/8/6 pavel kolodin pavelkolo...@gmail.com: On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:34:09 -, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: Why? Possible reasons: 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for

[squid-users] proxy: explicit transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread pavel kolodin
My squid + videocache returns HTTP 303 (see other) with URL http://10.10.10.1/videocache/youtube/1231...5151.flv; to browser. If i set proxy address and port in browser's settings, browser will do request to http://10.10.10.1/videocache...; returned with 303 by squid and successfully

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:18:41 -, pavel kolodin pavelkolo...@gmail.com wrote: My squid + videocache returns HTTP 303 (see other) with URL http://10.10.10.1/videocache/youtube/1231...5151.flv; to browser. If i set proxy address and port in browser's settings, browser will do request to

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread pavel kolodin
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:18:41 -, pavel kolodin Why? Possible reasons: 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for this. 2) transparent proxy aka intercepting proxy aka man-in-middle attack perhapse the plugin is smart enough to detect such attacks and prevent them from

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread pavel kolodin
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:34:09 -, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: Why? Possible reasons: 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for this. 2) transparent proxy aka intercepting proxy aka man-in-middle attack perhapse the plugin is smart enough to detect such attacks