Re: [squid-users] Squid SNMP remote monitoring and IP fragmentation

2018-03-06 Thread Peter Viskup
Communication is ok. Problem was with pcap filtering based on port number. Only the first fragment of the packet have this information. All others have port fields empty. More information in tcpdump man page in IP Fragmentation section. In new packet capture the request for 87 OIDs is replied with

Re: [squid-users] Squid SNMP remote monitoring and IP fragmentation

2018-03-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 06/03/18 23:36, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Is this SNMP value present in the cache-manager pages? > If so it would be pretty simple to write a script that will extract the > relevant data via http. > OID *.1.5.2.2 is the mgr:client_list table data, excluding the TCP_* code breakdown for respon

Re: [squid-users] Squid SNMP remote monitoring and IP fragmentation

2018-03-06 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf Of Amos Jeffries Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 15:38 To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid SNMP remote monitoring and IP fragmentation On 03/03/18 01:28, Peter Viskup wrote: > We do monitor

Re: [squid-users] Squid SNMP remote monitoring and IP fragmentation

2018-03-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 03/03/18 01:28, Peter Viskup wrote: > We do monitor our Squid's via SNMP with Zabbix and use the template > available on Zabbix share portal [1]. > Retrieval of values is not reliable. Seems to be related to IP fragmentation. > > The complete answer should be 4325B long. > > ~# snmpwalk -m /us

[squid-users] Squid SNMP remote monitoring and IP fragmentation

2018-03-02 Thread Peter Viskup
We do monitor our Squid's via SNMP with Zabbix and use the template available on Zabbix share portal [1]. Retrieval of values is not reliable. Seems to be related to IP fragmentation. The complete answer should be 4325B long. ~# snmpwalk -m /usr/share/squid3/mib.txt -v2c -CE .1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.5