Re: [squid-users] Hyper-threading, SSD vs HDD, CentOS vs Ubuntu Server and best performer Squid version

2018-10-29 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/28/18 4:13 PM, manuelfgarcia wrote: > According to https://wiki.squid-cache.org/BestOsForSquid : > "CPU speed and core count: > few faster cores are better than many slow cores. SMP Squid can currently > operate most efficiently with 4-8 cores of 3GHz or more. multi-tenant > installations

Re: [squid-users] Hyper-threading, SSD vs HDD, CentOS vs Ubuntu Server and best performer Squid version

2018-10-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 28.10.18 17:13, manuelfgarcia wrote: only the physical cores are useful, hyper-threaded "cores" can actually be worse. HT can add about 10-15% of CPU time when doing CPU inteensive tasks. squid usually contains no CPU intensive tasks. Considering the statement that "hyper-threaded "cores"

Re: [squid-users] Hyper-threading, SSD vs HDD, CentOS vs Ubuntu Server and best performer Squid version

2018-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 29/10/18 11:13 AM, manuelfgarcia wrote: > According to https://wiki.squid-cache.org/BestOsForSquid : > "CPU speed and core count: > few faster cores are better than many slow cores. SMP Squid can currently > operate most efficiently with 4-8 cores of 3GHz or more. multi-tenant > installations