Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For + Squid Version 3.0.STABLE8

2011-02-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:16:46 +1300 (NZDT), Pieter De Wit wrote: Hi Guys, I run a reverse proxy for a client. They are using XFF for restricting certain content to IP. We have noted that the following doesn't appear to work as it should: header_replace X-Forwarded-For allow all My

Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For + Squid Version 3.0.STABLE8

2011-02-20 Thread Pieter De Wit
Hi Amos, Thanks for the reply - I remember seeing the doc bug :) I am building the Deb6 boxes as we speak (ext4+squid 3.1 is sounding very nice) Cheers, Pieter On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote: On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:16:46 +1300 (NZDT), Pieter De Wit wrote: Hi Guys, I run a

Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For + Squid Version 3.0.STABLE8

2011-02-20 Thread Pieter De Wit
Hi Amos, just had a go at this: request_header_access X-Forwarded-For deny header_replace X-Forwarded-For and it's still passing XFF from another source thru - Nothing to urgent since the Deb6 boxes are getting built :) But if you spot something ? Cheers, Pieter

Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For + Squid Version 3.0.STABLE8

2011-02-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/02/11 16:33, Pieter De Wit wrote: Hi Amos, just had a go at this: request_header_access X-Forwarded-For deny header_replace X-Forwarded-For and it's still passing XFF from another source thru - Nothing to urgent since the Deb6 boxes are getting built :) But if you spot something ?

Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For + Squid Version 3.0.STABLE8

2011-02-20 Thread Pieter De Wit
On 21/02/2011 18:16, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 21/02/11 16:33, Pieter De Wit wrote: Hi Amos, just had a go at this: request_header_access X-Forwarded-For deny header_replace X-Forwarded-For and it's still passing XFF from another source thru - Nothing to urgent since the Deb6 boxes are getting