On Sat, December 10, 2016 12:49 pm, Richard Laager wrote:
> Here's one more patch. This is pretty minor stylistic stuff in
> imapproxy.conf that you may or may not agree with.
Hi Richard, thanks for all the patches. I will be reviewing them as soon
as I can make time. I have applied this one (th
Here's one more patch. This is pretty minor stylistic stuff in
imapproxy.conf that you may or may not agree with.
--
Richard
Description: Cleanup imapproxy.conf
Author: Richard Laager
Forwarded: no
Last-Update: 2016-11-30
--- a/scripts/imapproxy.conf
+++ b/scripts/imapproxy.conf
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @
I've attached another patch. This one fixes a spelling error.
--
Richard
Description: Fix spelling error
Author: Richard Laager
Forwarded: no
Last-Update: 2016-12-10
--- a/src/main.c
+++ b/src/main.c
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@
if ( strncasecmp( itd.ReadBuf, IMAP_TAGGED_OK, strlen(IMAP_TAGG
Moving to the imapproxy list.
I've been running with these patches in production for a couple days now
with no complaints.
However, my production system is not on OpenSSL 1.1, so that patch
hasn't gotten run-time testing, only compile-time.
I've also attached the patches, so you're not dependent
