Re: [SM-USERS] Bug Report - PlugiIn FILTER incompatible with PlugIn DELETE_MOVE_NEXT

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Gilles, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Gilles Gravier wrote... > I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list. > [ ] True - No need to CC me when replying > [X] False - Please CC me when replying > This bug occurs when I use a specific plugin/function > FILTER > DELETE_MOVE_N

RE: [SM-USERS] Multiple domains + Apache + SSL + SM

2002-11-28 Thread p dont think
Well, I am not at all sure why that isn't working for you, but I am very curious to find out! Attached is a modified version of webmail.php. You should back up your original copy of /src/webmail.php and then replace it with this one. This is different from the last thing I sent because it is doin

RE: [SM-USERS] endless cookie loop in compose

2002-11-28 Thread p dont think
This is normal. It is the quicksave plugin doing auto-saves of your current compose session into a cookie. That's how it can restore it later... if you don't want those warnings, turn down your browser sensitivity or disable the Quicksave plugin. Cheers, paul > -Original Message- > F

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-11-28 Thread p dont think
I have had similar experience when using a secure connection. The solution for me was to use the Secure_Login (or Show_SSL_Link) plugin and use the feature that lets you use SSL only for login, so the rest of the session is normal http://. Might not be what you want, but just a suggestion... > -

[SM-USERS] endless cookie loop in compose

2002-11-28 Thread Fabien Lamour
Hi, I have encountered this problem using netscape on both linux and windows. That is not to say that it does not occur on other platforms, only that I haven't tried anything else. Also, this problem only manifests itself when the user asks to be informed of all attempts to set cookies.

[SM-USERS] Bug Report - PlugiIn FILTER incompatible with PlugIn DELETE_MOVE_NEXT

2002-11-28 Thread Gilles Gravier
I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list. [ ] True - No need to CC me when replying [X] False - Please CC me when replying This bug occurs when I use a specific plugin/function FILTER DELETE_MOVE_NEXT The description of the bug: The plugins DELETE_MOVE_NEXT and FILTER aren't co

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough?

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Matías, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Matías López Bergero wrote... > Hello! > Maybe this is a silly question... > Is SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough for production?? > What's yous experiencies/recomentations? There was a couple of bugs in that version because of the unavailability of te

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough?

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Deano!, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Deano! wrote... > Anyone have a rough ETA for 1.4? I really need stable Japanese > language support, with all the nice plugins. I think we'll be working on the 1.4 series soon, couldn't give an exact date yet though. We're just working on the release

Re: [SM-USERS] preferences and signature are lost updating sm version!?

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Matías, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Matías López Bergero wrote... >>> I'm updating the version of squirrelmail, and I haved see, that >>> the preferences and the signature of the users are lost wen login >>> in the new version. Is there a way to prevent thist to happend? >> How did you

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough?

2002-11-28 Thread Deano!
Anyone have a rough ETA for 1.4? I really need stable Japanese language support, with all the nice plugins. I'll even trade: give me a good 1.4, and I'll fix the procmail plugin. -deano - Original Message - From: "Roland Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday,

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough?

2002-11-28 Thread Roland Fritz
Hi! > Maybe this is a silly question... it is *g* > Is SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough for production?? > What's yous experiencies/recomentations? Yes, it is the stable branch of this program and yes, it's already used for production systems. Roland.

[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough?

2002-11-28 Thread Matías López Bergero
Hello! Maybe this is a silly question... Is SquirrelMail 1.2.9 stable enough for production?? What's yous experiencies/recomentations? Best regards!! Matías.- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power &

RE : [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail stable with Apache2

2002-11-28 Thread kazh
Thank you for your answer, i wanted to know if a version of squirrelmail with file_exists (getcwd()."/somedir/somefile.php") exists. I know it's not a bug of (the great) squirrelmail ;-) Thanks for all. Regards, -- Kazh -Message d'origine- De : Jonathan Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail stable with Apache2

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Kazh, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, kazh wrote... > Hi all, > I've just installed Squirrelmail to a new box with Apache2 and i can see > that squirrelmail is unable to work because of this difference between > Apache1 and Apache2 : > Example: > Original code with Apache 1 : > file_exist

Re: [SM-USERS] preferences and signature are lost updating sm version!?

2002-11-28 Thread Matías López Bergero
Jonathan Angliss wrote: Hello Matías, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Matías López Bergero wrote... hi, I'm updating the version of squirrelmail, and I haved see, that the preferences and the signature of the users are lost wen login in the new version. Is there a way to prevent thist to happe

Re: [SM-USERS] Multiple domains + Apache + SSL + SM

2002-11-28 Thread Peter Hutnick
Lilla said: > The drawback is that all domains gives the same SSL-cert so people will > always get one warning when they enter your login-page I have faced this several times. My preferred approach at this point is to set up a "secure" host on one "main" domain. So, if I'm running hutnick.com a

Re: [SM-USERS] preferences and signature are lost updating sm version!?

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Matías, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Matías López Bergero wrote... > hi, > I'm updating the version of squirrelmail, and I haved see, that the > preferences and the signature of the users are lost wen login in the new > version. > Is there a way to prevent thist to happend? How did you

[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail stable with Apache2

2002-11-28 Thread kazh
Hi all, I've just installed Squirrelmail to a new box with Apache2 and i can see that squirrelmail is unable to work because of this difference between Apache1 and Apache2 : Example: Original code with Apache 1 : file_exists ("somedir/somefile.php"); // Always returns false Modified code with A

[SM-USERS] preferences and signature are lost updating sm version!?

2002-11-28 Thread Matías López Bergero
hi, I'm updating the version of squirrelmail, and I haved see, that the preferences and the signature of the users are lost wen login in the new version. Is there a way to prevent thist to happend? Regards! Matías.- --- This SF.net email is

[SM-USERS] Message Highliting Plugin

2002-11-28 Thread Brent S. Clark
Hi, Just a suggestion for the Message Highliting Plugin. It should be able to group multiple items for a color. For example currently you can specify to highlight all email from the my dad to orange. You cannot specify orange for email from both my mom and dad with one rule. I have to use two rule

Re: [SM-USERS] PHP errors in Windows version.

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Mairhtin, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote... > Hello, > I'm getting a lot of weird messages when I get to the login screen > of the Windows version of Squirrelmail. > First, even though I have the alias set, when I type in : > http://www.imadethis.com/squirrelmail

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with squirrel 1.2.9

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Marcelino, On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Marcelino Cunha wrote... > I had a OpenBsd 3.1 with squirrel 1.2.7 working ok. Today i do > upgrade of OpenBsd to 3.2 and squirrel stop to work. Also i do > upgrade to squirrel 1.3.9, but nothing change. The error on page is: We don't have a 1.3.9,

Re: [SM-USERS] PHP errors in Windows version.

2002-11-28 Thread Dimitrios Stergiou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 28 November 2002 06:40 pm, Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote: I has the same experience on a unix box. The only thing i did was a "rm *" in my "/tmp" dir and everything come to life maybe you should try something like cd \ delete sess*.* > Hel

[SM-USERS] PHP errors in Windows version.

2002-11-28 Thread Mairhtin O'Feannag
Hello, I'm getting a lot of weird messages when I get to the login screen of the Windows version of Squirrelmail. First, even though I have the alias set, when I type in : http://www.imadethis.com/squirrelmail (the alias in httpd.conf) I get a directory listing, and the index.php is not di

[SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-11-28 Thread Dimitrios Stergiou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there i have installed squirel mail 1.2.9 and i face the following problem i have installed it under 2 identical trees, one for ssl and one for non-ssl access when i use the non-ssl tree, everything works fine when i use the ssl tree, i can't fo

[SM-USERS] problem with squirrel 1.2.9

2002-11-28 Thread Marcelino Cunha
hello people, I had a OpenBsd 3.1 with squirrel 1.2.7 working ok. Today i do upgrade of OpenBsd to 3.2 and squirrel stop to work. Also i do upgrade to squirrel 1.3.9, but nothing change. The error on page is: Warning: open(/var/www/squirrelmail-1.2.9/data/sess_880eabc286b

Re: [SM-USERS] Multiple domains + Apache + SSL + SM

2002-11-28 Thread Lilla
Hi, The way I have configured Apache 1.3.27 to handle multiple domains is with namebased virutal hosts like this (httpd.conf): (I have a iptables nat-firewall, thats why I'm using 192.168.0.4) - ServerName mail.example1.com ServerAdmin [EMAIL