Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail Attachments are all viewed in the browser as Text (MIME)

2008-03-11 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Matthew Ortner (personal) wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification. I am running (Version 1.4.13 - 14 December > 2007) based on the changes log > file. > > I have also now turned off all plug-ins and the problem persists.  As > for the PHP header error, I checked my IIS server log as well as th

Re: [SM-USERS] Message reply hangs after upgrade to 1.4.13 from 1.4.10a

2008-03-11 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been running SquirrelMail 1.4.10a for about a year or so now, with > very happy users until I upgraded to 1.4.13. > > I run Apache/2.2.8 (Win32) & PHP/5.2.4 along with Mercury Mail Server > 4.52. I do not run any special plug

[SM-USERS] Message reply hangs after upgrade to 1.4.13 from 1.4.10a

2008-03-11 Thread webmaster
I have been running SquirrelMail 1.4.10a for about a year or so now, with very happy users until I upgraded to 1.4.13. I run Apache/2.2.8 (Win32) & PHP/5.2.4 along with Mercury Mail Server 4.52. I do not run any special plug-ins just the ones that came with the base install. Since the upgrade, us

Re: [SM-USERS] My inbox is always empty (Was: I have ur problem too)

2008-03-11 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> I also have got this problem > please let me know if u found the answer Please don't change the subject in a thread unnecessarily. "I have ur problem too" isn't a very helpful subject, and makes your mail look like spam. See for more details. If mails

Re: [SM-USERS] Need Reply!! Problem w/Email Delivery

2008-03-11 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:50 PM > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [SM-USERS] Need Reply!! Problem w/Email Delivery > > Hi, > I am sorr

Re: [SM-USERS] Need Reply!! Problem w/Email Delivery

2008-03-11 Thread Roland Fritz
Dear Patricia, > I am sorry to say but Squirrelmail drives me NUTS! I use it for my small > business, and problem is, when I send out an email - my clients do not > receive it until the next day - sometimes it ONLY takes about 9 hours if > I'm lucky!!! I can not have it continue to do this. I NE

Re: [SM-USERS] Need Reply!! Problem w/Email Delivery

2008-03-11 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> I am sorry to say but Squirrelmail drives me NUTS! I use it for my small > business, and problem is, when I send out an email - my clients do not > receive it until the next day - sometimes it ONLY takes about 9 hours if > I'm lucky!!! I can not have it continue to do this. I NEED my emails to >

[SM-USERS] I have ur problem too

2008-03-11 Thread titanic
I also have got this problem please let me know if u found the answer -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inbox-empty-tp5215673p15981152.html Sent from the squirrelmail-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [SM-USERS] outbind & blank.png

2008-03-11 Thread kriswarner
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > > kriswarner wrote: >> >> Has there been a solution to this? I'm having the same problem with some >> linked text in messages (i.e. someone did [a href="link.html"]link[/a], >> though not all of them - most will work. >> > > > It is not html. SquirrelMail does not

Re: [SM-USERS] outbind & blank.png

2008-03-11 Thread kriswarner
Jon Angliss wrote: > > Hi Greg > >> I get the following link on some of my messages generally mailing list >> generated/html messages. > >> The links all become: http://www.domain.com/sm/images/blank.png >> The links are functional if I open the same message with Outlook etc. > >> 1. #1 Text

[SM-USERS] Need Reply!! Problem w/Email Delivery

2008-03-11 Thread info
Hi, I am sorry to say but Squirrelmail drives me NUTS! I use it for my small business, and problem is, when I send out an email - my clients do not receive it until the next day - sometimes it ONLY takes about 9 hours if I'm lucky!!! I can not have it continue to do this. I NEED my emails to get

Re: [SM-USERS] outbind & blank.png

2008-03-11 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
kriswarner wrote: > > > Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >> >> >> kriswarner wrote: >>> >>> But for the most part, if one link doesn't work in an email, none of >>> them do, and vice versa. Could this just be an error on the part of the >>> way the sender composed the email and MIME stuff? (perhaps no

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail Attachments are all viewed in the browser as Text (MIME)

2008-03-11 Thread Matthew Ortner (personal)
Thanks for the clarification.  I am running (Version 1.4.13 - 14 December 2007) based on the changes log file. I have also now turned off all plug-ins and the problem persists.  As for the PHP header error, I checked my IIS server log as well as the various windows event logs and didn't see an

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail Attachments are all viewed in the browser as Text (MIME)

2008-03-11 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Matthew Ortner (personal) wrote: > > Hi, > > I am new to SquirrelMail and this list (and PHP for that matter) but I > have installed and have been using: > > SquirrelMail 1.4.0 > conf.pl shows configuration file version and not SquirrelMail version. Same version is used for all 1.4.x Squi

Re: [SM-USERS] outbind & blank.png

2008-03-11 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
kriswarner wrote: > > Has there been a solution to this? I'm having the same problem with some > linked text in messages (i.e. someone did [a href="link.html"]link[/a], > though not all of them - most will work. > It is not html. SquirrelMail does not support bbcode. > But for the most part