Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> * Security fixes are not ported to 1.5.1.
>
So, 1.5.1 is missing dozens of security fixes?
Sounds like 1.4 is much safer for production use.
>>> 1.5.1 does not have those fixes. Fixes are included in 1.5.2-svn.
>>> 1.5.2-svn is current devel branch. I don't
> The link on the squirrelmail home page titled "There are separate
> patches available for only the security issues against various previous
> versions" leads to http://squirrelmail.org/patches/1.4.10-security/
>
> Does the patch for 1.5.1 include all of the security patches?
Five more patche
* Security fixes are not ported to 1.5.1.
>>> So, 1.5.1 is missing dozens of security fixes?
>>> Sounds like 1.4 is much safer for production use.
>>
>> 1.5.1 does not have those fixes. Fixes are included in 1.5.2-svn.
>> 1.5.2-svn is current devel branch. I don't use 1.5.2-svn and can'
Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>>> * Security fixes are not ported to 1.5.1.
>>>
>> So, 1.5.1 is missing dozens of security fixes?
>> Sounds like 1.4 is much safer for production use.
>
> 1.5.1 does not have those fixes. Fixes are included in 1.5.2-svn.
> 1.5.2-svn is current devel branch. I don't use 1.5.
>> * Security fixes are not ported to 1.5.1.
>>
>
> So, 1.5.1 is missing dozens of security fixes?
> Sounds like 1.4 is much safer for production use.
1.5.1 does not have those fixes. Fixes are included in 1.5.2-svn.
1.5.2-svn is current devel branch. I don't use 1.5.2-svn and can't tell if
it is
Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>> So, the development of 1.5.x has been 2+ years now. I notice that it's
>> been downloaded (according to the counters) nearly as much as 1.4.x, and
>> most plugins work with it.
>
> According to SF counters (excluding rpms)
> 1.4.6 (released 2006-02-23) -1.4.10 = 440645
>
> So, the development of 1.5.x has been 2+ years now. I notice that it's
> been downloaded (according to the counters) nearly as much as 1.4.x, and
> most plugins work with it.
According to SF counters (excluding rpms)
1.4.6 (released 2006-02-23) -1.4.10 = 440645
1.5.1 (released 2006-02-19) =
Hallo, Ken,
Du (ka) meintest am 12.09.07:
> So, the development of 1.5.x has been 2+ years now. I notice that
> it's been downloaded (according to the counters) nearly as much as
> 1.4.x, and most plugins work with it.
> Are there any/some/many of you using it in production without issues
> - a
On 12 Sep 2007 at 14:23, Ken A wrote:
>
> So, the development of 1.5.x has been 2+ years now. I notice that it's
> been downloaded (according to the counters) nearly as much as 1.4.x, and
> most plugins work with it.
>
> Are there any/some/many of you using it in production without issues -
>
