Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Steve Moyes
Hi Ken, That sounds perfect... I'll start playing right away. Fingers crossed. Thanks for the advice I really appreciate it. Cheers Steve On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 08:56 -0500, Ken A wrote: > Steve Moyes wrote: > > Hi, > > yes.. separate credentials are one of the things that has specificall

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Steve Moyes
Hi, yes.. separate credentials are one of the things that has specifically been requested. I have everything ready to go, it's just this authentication issue I have. Cheers Steve On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:24 +0200, Roland Fritz wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the sh

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Roland Fritz
Hi Steve, > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered about.. > allow me to explain further. > What I was thinking is, the frontend squirrelmail is just that, nothing > else. It will be just a webserver, serving that page. There will be no > user accounts on there what so

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Steve Moyes
Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered about.. allow me to explain further. What I was thinking is, the frontend squirrelmail is just that, nothing else. It will be just a webserver, serving that page. There will be no user accounts on there what so ever. I was thinking

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Paul Lesniewski
Please do NOT top post, thank you. > > > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered about.. > > > allow me to explain further. > > > What I was thinking is, the frontend squirrelmail is just that, nothing > > > else. It will be just a webserver, serving that page. There will

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Steve Moyes wrote: > > Hi thanx for the reply. It's not the shell access I'm bothered about.. > allow me to explain further. > What I was thinking is, the frontend squirrelmail is just that, nothing > else. It will be just a webserver, serving that page. There will be no > user accounts on th

Re: [SM-USERS] Server authentication

2007-10-12 Thread Ken A
Steve Moyes wrote: > Hi, > yes.. separate credentials are one of the things that has specifically > been requested. I have everything ready to go, it's just this > authentication issue I have. So, you are trying to map usernames from one system to another? I'm not really clear on why this would