[SM-USERS] SSL Login

2002-12-26 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm running SM1.27 (the latest update from Red Hat Network) with SSL login. An attempt at http login correctly redirects to https, but after the login page, we stay at https instead of going back to http. It was my understanding that it is supposed to switch back to http. Is this something fixed i

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL Login

2002-12-29 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Well, Red Hat Network just updated SM from 1.2.7 to 1.2.8, and now secure_login properly returns to http after the login page! THANKS! Harold --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf -

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug Report

2002-12-31 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm running RH8.0 with Apache 2 and SM1.2.8, and they all work great together! i think RH8.0 ships with SM1.2.7, but Red Hat Network just updated it to 1.2.8. Harold > > >> Hello Yury, >> On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, Yury German wrote... >> > >> >>> Well I guess I will answer my own bug rep

RE: [SM-USERS] Mail_fetch/Fetch mail problems

2003-01-16 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Speaking of POP3 fetch, I'm finding that most of the time, I'm getting "Error [111] (Connection refused). However, sometimes it DOES work. I'm running SM 1.2.8 (latest Red Hat Network distribution). This happens with both POP servers SM is trying to get mail from. Any ideas? Thanks! Harold -

RE: [SM-USERS] Mail_fetch/Fetch mail problems

2003-01-16 Thread Harold Hallikainen
>> Any ideas? > > Who is your POP provider? Are the servers heavily loaded? > > We got these kind of errors frequently when we had Interland as > our POP email provider. > > In short: Maybe it's just an overloaded/failing POP server? > > > --Derek I'm using two different P

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail & Security

2003-07-16 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I have run SM on SSL with almost no problems. On large attachments, SSL would burp, but otherwise stuff was fine. There's an SSL login plug-in that I now use so only the login is SSL. This encrypts the username and password. Mail going back and forth is not encrypted. This seems fine to me. Harold

[SM-USERS] subscribe/unsubscribe folders

2003-11-25 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm having a problem with the folders page with subscribe/unsubscribe . The subscribe window fills up with every file in my user directory (including all my web pages in public_html). I'd like all mail folders to be in /home/username/mail . I'm running SM1.4.2 on RH8 . The imap server is cyrus

[SM-USERS] Feature Request - Filter on sender presence in SM address book

2004-02-08 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Any chance a filter based on the sender's presence in a user's address book could be added? I think the presence would be a pretty good indicator that the message is not spam. THANKS! Harold -- FCC Rules Online at http://www.hallikainen.com --

[SM-USERS] Error when enabling spam filters

2004-02-08 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm running SM 1.4.2 with pop mail fetch. I get the error below if I enable one of the spam filters (like SpamCop). Any idea what to do? Thanks! Harold ERROR : Bad or malformed request. Query: FETCH 4132,8878,16076,16310,16680,22653,36917,41374,48230,51185,52685,57247,80485,87348,87387,87401,113

Re: [SM-USERS] Fatal error

2004-03-18 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I used to have that happen. Turns out that SM was trying to put EVERY directory and subdirectory in /home/harold in the subscribe window. Since there are thousands of directories there (I have thousands of pages in public_html), it'd eventually give up. The fix was to change options - folder prefer

Re: [SM-USERS] invisible folders

2004-03-18 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Did you go to the folders page in SM and "subscribe" to the folder? It will not show up in the folder frame until you do. Harold > I've has a good search around for this one but I can't seem to find what > I'm looking for. > > I have the latest stable squirrelmail running on a Windoes 2003 server

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: invisible folders

2004-03-21 Thread Harold Hallikainen
; > > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:50:47 -0800 (PST) > > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] invisible folders > > From: "Harold Hallikainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Did you go to the folders page in SM and "subscribe" to the folde

[SM-USERS] spam filters

2004-04-16 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm getting buried in spam! This morning I had over 150 messages pushing drugs. I imagine a lot of this could be stopped by the spam filter optin in SM, but when I enable it, I get the error message: ERROR : Bad or malformed request. Query: FETCH 41374,48230,52685,80485,231283,270438,270604,2

Re: [SM-USERS] SM vs IMAP/SSL

2002-10-31 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Of course, everything between the client and SM is encrypted by SSL, but I don't think the stuff between SM and IMAP is. And the original writer wanted to keep unencrypted stuff off the LAN between SM and the IMAP server. I'm running SM and IMAP server on the same machine, so this is not an

Re: [SM-USERS] SM vs IMAP/SSL

2002-10-31 Thread Harold Hallikainen
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Lilla wrote: > > The machine running RH7.3 (and the SSL > > hole) now has port 443 blocked at the router so I can use SM on the LAN, > > but use pine over SSH from the outside world (where I am now). > > Are others generally running SM over SSL? > > At my place we _only_ a

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Here are a few comments on SSL on RH8.0. In the version of Apache shipped with RH8.0, the SSL configuration got moved to its own file : /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf . The root of the SSL directory tree is defined in there with a statement like: ## ## SSL Virtual Host Context ## # # Gene

[SM-USERS] fetch mail plugin data location?

2012-01-01 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm moving to a new server and have moved over all the user preferences (address book, calendar, etc.), but apparently not the pop fetchmail data. Does somewhere know where it is so I can copy it over? Thanks! Harold -- FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com - Advertising oppor

Re: [SM-USERS] fetch mail plugin data location?

2012-01-02 Thread Harold Hallikainen
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Harold Hallikainen > wrote: >> I'm moving to a new server and have moved over all the user preferences >> (address book, calendar, etc.), but apparently not the pop fetchmail >> data. >> Does somewhere know where it is so I c

Re: [SM-USERS] fetch mail plugin data location?

2012-01-02 Thread Harold Hallikainen
> > I gave you the prefix of preference setting names that are found > inside user preference stores - nothing to do with file names. See > also Curtis' reply. > > -- > Paul Lesniewski > SquirrelMail Team > Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! > http://squirrelmail.org

Re: [SM-USERS] fetch mail plugin data location?

2012-01-02 Thread Harold Hallikainen
>> Ah, I see it now. Thanks! For some reason that file did not get copied >> over. Are the pref file formats the same between versions 1.4.20-2 and >> 1.4.22-2? > > I have no way of knowing. Those are not SquirrelMail version numbers. > > The preference formats for SquirrelMail versions 1.4.20 an

Re: [SM-USERS] Pass SM login failures to Fail2Ban?

2025-07-04 Thread Harold Hallikainen via squirrelmail-users
Never mind! It looks like fail2ban already has something for this. I just have to figure out how to configure it. Thanks! Harold On Fri, July 4, 2025 4:59 pm, Harold Hallikainen via squirrelmail-users wrote: > Is this possible? I get several hundered ssh login failures each day that >

[SM-USERS] Pass SM login failures to Fail2Ban?

2025-07-04 Thread Harold Hallikainen via squirrelmail-users
Is this possible? I get several hundered ssh login failures each day that I pass to fail2ban to block those IP addresses. It seems like there MIGHT similarly be SM login failures that would be nice to block. Harold -- Not sent from an iPhone. - squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting gu