[sqwebmail] Re: riwos security

2003-10-01 Thread matti
Rubbish The *DEMO* is open. Password is public. Where is the risk? James A Baker kirjoittaa: On Wednesday, Oct 1, 2003, at 00:59 US/Central, matti wrote: [...] If these files are backward browsable with visible history is insingificant. [...] No. The point is that this *IS* significant.

Re: [sqwebmail] Re: riwos security

2003-10-01 Thread James A Baker
On Wednesday, Oct 1, 2003, at 01:54 US/Central, matti wrote: James A Baker kirjoittaa: On Wednesday, Oct 1, 2003, at 00:59 US/Central, matti wrote: [...] If these files are backward browsable with visible history is insingificant. [...] No. The point is that this *IS* significant. -- Maybe not

[sqwebmail] Re: riwos security

2003-10-01 Thread matti
I will state again, that my changes only deal with how folders are listed and sorted, immediate removal of deleted emails, theme selection by user, the page layout choices, a couple of new functions, as the session time countdown, and rewritten templates. The use of css obviously requires a

Re: [sqwebmail] Re: riwos security

2003-10-01 Thread James A Baker
On Wednesday, Oct 1, 2003, at 03:58 US/Central, matti wrote: I will state again, that my changes only deal with how folders are listed and sorted, immediate removal of deleted emails, theme selection by user, the page layout choices, a couple of new functions, as the session time countdown,