Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Patches should be backported by now in the 5.x.x branches, if you still find an issue, open another item on the tracker. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Closed #1315. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1315#event-1354482513___ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-17 Thread Surendra Tiwari
@miconda i tested with master branch.its working fine.it will be good if you can commit all changes related to ipv6 to all stable releases specially to 5.x.x branches.reference to following pull request: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1319

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-17 Thread Surendra Tiwari
@miconda i will test the same.we are expecting all ipv6 patch to be merged with stable branch so we can start using those only. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-17 Thread Surendra Tiwari
@miconda yes ,i have advertise address to the listen socket. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
I just pushed another patch (referenced above), because there were other cases when the same condition was used. The new patch is taking a safer path by checking if the ipv6 address starts with `[`. Can you test and report if ok? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Do you have advertise address to the listen socket? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1315#issuecomment-345242408___

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-17 Thread Surendra Tiwari
@miconda please review this also for record_route header -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1315#issuecomment-345227681___

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] core: removing the condition for second record_route ipv6 header (#1315)

2017-11-15 Thread Surendra Tiwari
Pre-Submission Checklist - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files