Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2018-02-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Closed #1349. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1349#event-1477417229___ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List sr-dev@l

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2018-02-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Closing this one, following the patch referenced above. If still an issue, reopen or create a new issue as the module got new code inside it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamail

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2018-01-08 Thread Julien Chavanton
Hi, I am still thinking about finding some time to test this in a few days / weeks ... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1349#issuecomment-356127602__

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2017-12-20 Thread Charles Chance
@jchavanton - would you mind running some tests again with 851e610 to see if there is an improvement? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1349#issuecomment-353100886___

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2017-12-06 Thread Julien Chavanton
I am guessing FQDN resolving to multiple IPs will greatly improve things ! I will test it and maybe we could document a wiki page on how to configure DMQ bus -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2017-12-05 Thread Charles Chance
Thanks for reporting and for taking the time to test different scenarios. Using your examples I will try to reproduce locally but out of interest, do you observe the same behaviour if notification address is an FQDN resolving to multiple IPs? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribe

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2017-12-02 Thread Julien Chavanton
I also tried the ring strategy but, I did not like the fact that if you loose one server the ring may get broken. Maybe this is still better in the end but when you have a lot of server it is more likely that one server may be removed from service. This is why I am testing with a "master" node

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2017-12-02 Thread Julien Chavanton
Hi Charles, I guess we can fix this, I think there is a second case where things can break I will try to find it a document it as well. Or maybe I should simply use different config ... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it o

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sequence breaking DMQ bus (#1349)

2017-12-02 Thread Julien Chavanton
I reproduced in a lab with 3 Kamailio servers ``` kamailio_first 127.0.0.101 modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:127.0.0.101:5060") modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:127.0.0.103:5060") modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 2) modparam("dmq", "ping_interva