Re: [sr-dev] rfc: clang format the code

2017-11-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 24.11.17 09:12, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 23. November 2017, 17:20:48 CET schrieb Daniel-Constantin > Mierla: > >> it was discussed during the last irc devel meeting and everyone there >> agreed to use clang-format to format the source code: >> >> -

Re: [sr-dev] rfc: clang format the code

2017-11-24 Thread Juha Heinanen
Am Donnerstag, 23. November 2017, 17:20:48 CET schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > it was discussed during the last irc devel meeting and everyone there > agreed to use clang-format to format the source code: > > - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html Does anyone have emacs

Re: [sr-dev] rfc: clang format the code

2017-11-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello Henning, indeed, git blame is not going to show directly the original author... as I wanted to see if there is a solution for this, I found:   - https://blog.andrewray.me/a-better-git-blame/ and actually a comment there seems to be a decent solution to go back in the history of the

Re: [sr-dev] rfc: clang format the code

2017-11-23 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Donnerstag, 23. November 2017, 17:20:48 CET schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > it was discussed during the last irc devel meeting and everyone there > agreed to use clang-format to format the source code: > > - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html > > Is any developer (maybe not

[sr-dev] rfc: clang format the code

2017-11-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, it was discussed during the last irc devel meeting and everyone there agreed to use clang-format to format the source code:   - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html Is any developer (maybe not present during the irc devel meeting) opposing this? It is not going to be all at