Closed #1150.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1150#event-1130489809___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
Thanks, closing it then!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1150#issuecomment-309676278___
Kamailio (SER) - Development
yep. It works now! :-) thank you
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1150#issuecomment-309675518___
Kamailio (SER) -
So #1155 is fixing also the introduced bug with bad pointer?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1155
looks like it has been fixed :-)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
bingo! :-)
now another issue:
/usr/sbin/kamailio[1798]: ERROR: topoh [topoh_mod.c:560]:
th_execute_event_route(): exit due to 'drop' in event route
/usr/sbin/kamailio[1798]: : [core/mem/q_malloc.c:469]: qm_free(): BUG:
qm_free: bad pointer 0x7fa3461b9000 (out of memory block!) called from
Indeed, that condition should be with &&.
Is the next fake msg null, or what is failing there? Can you see what is the
return code for t_relay? I guess the slow error is because of sl_send_error ()
in kamaulio.cfg. I am traveling, no much testing that I can do.
--
You are receiving this
Thank you @miconda , unfortunately there is bug that I couldnt catch.
6 days ago I have implemented same way in my repository:
https://github.com/adubovikov/kamailio/commit/ae15a717e9a5849b4ac295c5864cd6e9b198b6d1
but your and my patches makes same results:
/usr/sbin/kamailio[1260]: ERROR: sl
Can this be used for topos as well as topoh?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1150#issuecomment-309004565___
Kamailio (SER)
I did an implementation to execute an event_route before the topoh processing
for messages to be sent out. Documentation will follow soon, meanwhile you can
see the comments of the commit f7d1d23 . Basically, $sndto(ip) should point
to the ip address of the destination and calling `drop`
ok. agree.. this way will be more effective and flexible. Should I do or you
wanna ? ;-)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Giving a fake request is very fast, like done at:
*
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/htable/htable.c#L268
It is no parsing apart of the first time. This way is safe, because some
functions need the msg structure.
--
You are receiving this because you are
so, from topoh we can call topoh-route in kamailio.cfg , there we can use
allow_address from the permissions module and base on the result we can reject
and accept topoh request. Should we just send empty sip_msg structure there ?
Just to avoid sip message parsing in case the request will be
We have the source code, we can change if something helps substantially --
currently, I see two options that can be controlled via a mod param (or just
choose one that it is considered better):
* give a fake request, like it is done with other event_route blocks (e.g.,
htable:mod-init) --
Yes, exactly this way, just to exclude or include destination IP for topology
hiding.
I am not sure that there is a way to do it via internal flags, because the
event socket for SREV_NET_DATA_OUT will be called from retransmission function
in the tm module and in this case you don't have
What is exactly the purpose of this new functionality? To allow/deny traffic
from those IP addresses or for doing/skipping topology hiding?
I am somehow not very pleased with importing a lot of code similar to what
permissions does in regards to address matching. I would rather do another
16 matches
Mail list logo
