Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Make command in Kamailio rtpengine module asynchronous (Issue #3283)

2022-11-21 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, in case of more detailed questions for an module extension its better to discuss on our developer mailing list (sr-dev). Regarding the asynchronous topic, so far there has not been a need for that. Usually rtpengine can be quite good scaled, its used in installation with several ten

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Make command in Kamailio rtpengine module asynchronous (Issue #3283)

2022-11-21 Thread Aditya_gupta
We need to make commands in rtpengine module asynchronous just like it is in evapi module which improves efficiency. I need help in it. Firstly I need to know which all commands in rtpengine has to be supported by asynchronous complementary functions. Secondly I was trying to understand the

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] ims_usrloc_pcscf: implementation of db_mode DB_ONLY (value 3) (PR #3279)

2022-11-21 Thread petermarianF
I finally did a rebase to resolve the conflict in the admin xml. To summarize my changes after first review: 1. removed unnecessary comments 2. changed INFO/CRIT logs into DBG/ERR logs 3. removed my changes to db_insert_pcontact and db_update_pcontact 4. removed method which deleted pua entry in

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] ims_usrloc_pcscf: implementation of db_mode DB_ONLY (value 3) (PR #3279)

2022-11-21 Thread petermarianF
My resolve action probably did not work as it seems file does not have been saved. But I copied the changes to my local branch and the README build was fine including Hennings last change. So probably I could add another commit with admin xml -- Reply to this email directly or view it on

[sr-dev] git: new commits in branch master

2022-11-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/8c4feb02e0e85771746b5c39af9fe65fbe54384e Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Date: 2022-11-21T08:48:18+01:00 ims_dialog: cast pv value to long - URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/00a8b6d765cdd8a1fc3b77416912f1163801a40e

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] ims_usrloc_pcscf: implementation of db_mode DB_ONLY (value 3) (PR #3279)

2022-11-21 Thread petermarianF
I resolved conflict in src/modules/ims_usrloc_pcscf/doc/ims_usrloc_pcscf_admin.xml by editing this file and clicking "Mark as resolved" -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3279#issuecomment-1321829334 You are receiving this because you