Closed #1143.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1143#event-1107499968___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
@miconda yes, I'm going to do that and remove the signing phase too
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@adubovikov - thanks for testing and feedback! Signing is a matter of providing
a certificate to sign the packages, not offered by `make deb`, iirc, its about
a dpkg-buildpackage parameter.
@linuxmaniac - will you push your patch and backport to 5.0?
--
You are receiving this because you are
Yep. all good, only problem with sign, but this is IMHO different issue...
```
make[5]: *** No rule to make target 'maintainer-clean'. Stop.
/usr/bin/make --no-print-directory -C lib maintainer-clean
Making maintainer-clean in srdb1
Making maintainer-clean in srdb2
Making maintainer-clean in ims
@linuxmaniac - I guessed that, the `make deb` was added for convenience, I use
it sometimes when doing releases to see it compiles ok, or run directly
dpkg-buildpackage, which I guess I did for v5.0.
@adubovikov - have you had the time to check the patch from @linuxmaniac? If
all ok, then it
FTR We don't use that rule at all in the process of building the debs
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
ok. I will test @miconda solution and let you know
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1143#issuecomment-305527801___
Problem here is that make deb rules are wrong. There is were we have to make
the fix.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
