On 02/12/2016 11:21, Alex Hermann wrote:
> On donderdag 1 december 2016 15:17:18 CET Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> RPC is the alternative, a more standardized
>> concept, with better structured format.
> Before removing MI and letting everyone move to RPC, it might be wise to go
> over all
On 02/12/2016 00:24, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Brandon Armstead writes:
>
>> +1 - I'm all for cleaning up any technical debt and moving on with more
>> normalized concept.
> I'm also in favor of getting rid on MI interface. I'm myself relying
> only on one MI command (pua_publish) for which an RPC
> I would also say that at this point, almost all classical uses of MI
> that I know of can be met with RPC.
Alex,
Did you see my message about pua_mi? Is there now rpc version of it that
I have missed to notice?
-- Juha
___
sr-dev mailing list
I would also say that at this point, almost all classical uses of MI
that I know of can be met with RPC.
If, in removing MI for v5.0, something should be overlooked, I trust any
howls of protest will expediently illuminate any small things that fell
through the cracks. The major functionality
Brandon Armstead writes:
> +1 - I'm all for cleaning up any technical debt and moving on with more
> normalized concept.
I'm also in favor of getting rid on MI interface. I'm myself relying
only on one MI command (pua_publish) for which an RPC command does not
exist (or did not exist last time
+1 - I'm all for cleaning up any technical debt and moving on with more
normalized concept.
:)
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:17 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we started discussing about removing MI (so called management interface)
>