Just tested both with TCP and UDP. Its working fine. Thank you very much!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#issuecomment-365872768___
Oups
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#issuecomment-365868838___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev
Have you set `force_send_socket` parameter of `rr` module to `1`? I don't see
it in your comment that shows `rr` params in config.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1
Daniel, in fact it is not working. See previous comment.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#issuecomment-365862634___
K
If I inspect the packet I see a single route without transport information. And
yet the correct source port is selected ! Can you tell us how kamailio guess
the source port to use in that case.
These traces demonstrate that in the loose_route() function, send_socket is NOT
forced. And yet th
Ok, I tested and it is working but I would kindly need an explanation
1- the setup :
- kamailio 5.1 with three listen (on port 5060, 5063, 5066)
- 2 UAs using UDP on port 5063
- added a log in the script
```
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
# sequential request with
OK, let's see the results, because it should work for single Route header, that
was the purpose of the patch.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#issuecomment-3649
No I did not test it. I will.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#issuecomment-364925128___
Kamailio (SER) - Developmen
Did you just review the code or you also tested it?
It covers the cases when enable_double_rr is 1 (or different than 0) and there
is no second Route header. Because if there is a second route, then the socket
is forced later to the outgoing socket.
--
You are receiving this because you are su
Hi Daniel,
I reviewed the code and unfortunately, it does not cover the case when
- enable_double_rr=1
- both UA are using the same IP and the same port and there is only one route
inserted by record_route()
To handle this case, see the patch I suggest below. Alternatively, we could set
enab
Thank you for your time!
One of our engineer is currently testing it. If we have any issue or comments
,we will come back to you.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1
Closing after the commit and remarks in the previous comment.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#issuecomment-364850721
Closed #1428.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1428#event-1468935219___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@l
I pushed a commit to rr module adding a new parameter that allows enforcing
send socket even on a single Route header - see
93739c0b8674a09f8364eac6f28bcc91b167843a .
Testing and providing feedback will be appreciated.
Anyhow, for older versions you can force the socket from config, after
loos
14 matches
Mail list logo
