Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-12-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 11.12.18 07:25, David Escartín wrote: > > hello Daniel > > yes, it seems that, some kind of hardware issue or limitation. > OK, clear. Daniel > PD: sorry, the email is descar...@sonoc.io :$ > > > best regards > > david > > On 10/12/18 16:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >>

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-12-10 Thread David Escartín
hello Daniel yes, it seems that, some kind of hardware issue or limitation. PD: sorry, the email is descar...@sonoc.io :$ best regards david On 10/12/18 16:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, just to clarify -- it was the server (at operating system or hardware) levels causing iss

Re: [SR-Users] P-CSCF without Rx interface

2018-12-10 Thread Mojtaba
Hi, The answer is right, About your question: "I'm not able to find how to tell P-CSCF where to direct the sip traffic. It obviously should happen in route[REGISTER]." In [REGISTER] route block you could see this line: $ru = "sip:"+$rU+"@"+$rd; Actually you are setting R-URI, In this line the $rd

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-12-10 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 10 December 2018 at 16:49:32, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > BTW, every time sending emails to you as a response from mailing lists > > results in errors to deliver, respectively: > > DNS Error: 11795256 DNS type 'mx' lookup of sonoc.cio responded with > > code NXDOMAIN Domain name

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-12-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
BTW, every time sending emails to you as a response from mailing lists results in errors to deliver, respectively: > DNS Error: 11795256 DNS type 'mx' lookup of sonoc.cio responded with code NXDOMAIN Domain name not found: sonoc.cio However, you seem to get the emails, as you respond. Is any misc

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-12-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, just to clarify -- it was the server (at operating system or hardware) levels causing issues (delays in processing), not app/kamailio level, right? It is what I get since you say you had to replace the machines... Cheers, Daniel On 10.12.18 15:06, David Escartín wrote: > Hello Daniel > >

Re: [SR-Users] P-CSCF without Rx interface

2018-12-10 Thread Iman Mohammadi
Hi You can comment RX in pcscf.cfg but if you don't use a PCRF or a EPC that's not VoLTE call any more and You can use a softphone like Zoiper to set up call on your ims and check your ports that you specify for P-CSCF and I-CSCF in DNS and cfg files for solving loop problem On Mon, Dec 10, 2018,

[SR-Users] P-CSCF without Rx interface

2018-12-10 Thread Tsvetan Filev
Hi All. May be this has been asked before but I was not able to find an answer. I setup IMS with 3 instances of kamailio: P-CSCF, I-CSCF and S-CSCF (I got the config files from here https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/tree/master/misc/examples/ims). I would like to register two clients to the

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-12-10 Thread David Escartín
Hello Daniel sorry for the delay We actually saw that the server running the kamailio had like issues to handle all of the traffic, so seems the delayed process of messages came from there. Since it was happening on a production environment, we had to replace the machines, so now they are runni