You are nesting one problem description into another and it all does not
makes any sense to me.
Anyways, what i understand is that you are trying to engage two RTP proxies
in series from WAN to LAN to WAN again. So you need to create media bridge
at each kamailio instance that routes RTP traffic f
Dear Community,
I have a problem with rtpproxy not changing the SDP IP in connection
information in following scenario:
SIP1 -> kamailio1 + rtpproxy1 -> kamailio2 + rtpproxy2 -> SIP2
The first kamailio put SDP IP correctly (from rtpproxy) then the second
kamailio does not change SDP connection
Yes but 2 problems with this:
1) listen parameter does not seem to accept an SRV or hostname
listen=udp:MYPRIVATEIP:EXTERNALPORT advertise EXTERNALHOSTNAME
causes the listen line to be ignored
2) My goal is not to do any state replication so I only want the SRV in
record-route not VIA. VIA will st
Hi Alex,
We have a similar issue (slightly complex) as it involves sip parallel forking.
The issue is that failure_route[] occurs when all sip forked are exhausted even
though "302 Moved Temporarily" has been responded back by one of the SIP
endpoint quite quickly.
So, we wish to handle 302 on
Hi,
CANCEL message doesn't show up in "onsend_route".
I'm only able to the the 200OK reply received from the device in
"reply_route", I can probably get the via-branch from there, but I don't
have access to the AVPs...
Having a dedicate event route, or reuse an existing one, would be the
bes
Siremis v5.3.0 is out – the open source web management interface for
Kamailio SIP Server.
This version comes with major changes and many new features, among them
the removal of legacy flash charts (now uses pure JS), make the code
compatible with PHP 7.x and web views to manage many new modules ad
Never tried that but probably makes sence to check event_route[network:msg]
It acts in the network layer and message itself has to be parsed by some
additional script, but still an option.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, 10:36 Daniel-Constantin Mierla,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the last option to try is onsend
Hello,
the last option to try is onsend_route and if the CANCEL shows up there,
then use some string operations over $snd(buf) to get the Via branch,
last value after "." being the branch index. I am not sure you can get
the INVITE avps there, but you can try.
Otherwise a new event route has to b
Hi Yuriy,
thanks for the suggestion.
I tried both "event_route[tm:local-request]" and
"event_route[tm:local-response]" but internally generated CANCEL
messages are not captured by those event routes.
On the contrary, I can see that OPTIONS, NOTIFY and also PUBLISH
messages are there.
Do you
Hello,
if you control the freeswitches or change where they send
traffic/receive traffic, then I recommend to use two listen parameters
with advertise address, like:
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5060 advertise publicsrv:5060
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080
and carriers will be linked to my.ip.ad.dr:5060,
Hello,
so it is more about transparently replacing one header in both directions. You
could probably implement something like this with the help of the dialog
module, or more lightweight with the htable module and normal header texops
operations. Maybe the topo* modules are also worth a look fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
