Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread KamDev Essa
Awesome. Thanks. Will make sure I use that term.  This thread was very informative.  Thanks again KD On Tuesday, May 22, 2018, 12:30:08 PM EDT, Alex Balashov wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:24:35PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: >  Pardon my ignorance. You are right. I need to get my term

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread Alex Balashov
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:24:35PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: > Pardon my ignorance. You are right. I need to get my terms correct > for sure.  In a the Contact header for example  what > do you call the abc123 part?  So what  was tryng to say was that in a > standalone 300 Multiple Choices onl

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread KamDev Essa
Pardon my ignorance. You are right. I need to get my terms correct for sure.  In a the Contact header for example  what do you call the abc123 part?  So what  was tryng to say was that in a standalone 300 Multiple Choices only LCR solution I would send back the abc123 for the Multiple hosts in m

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread Alex Balashov
What? Replies don't have a RURI. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:12:27PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: > If its a simple LCR solution returning Multiple routes I will only use a > single $rU in the URI. Correct. I know your example maybe for follow me where > we have different destinations.  > KD >

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread KamDev Essa
If its a simple LCR solution returning Multiple routes I will only use a single $rU in the URI. Correct. I know your example maybe for follow me where we have different destinations.  KD On Tuesday, May 22, 2018, 11:56:18 AM EDT, Alex Balashov wrote: I don't know your logic for pullin

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread Alex Balashov
I don't know your logic for pulling your contacts? On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:52:30PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: > Why do I need to change the $rU (abc123 and def456) will it not always be > abc123 based on the $rU I get? > KD > On Tuesday, May 22, 2018, 11:40:02 AM EDT, Alex Balashov > wr

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread KamDev Essa
Why do I need to change the $rU (abc123 and def456) will it not always be abc123 based on the $rU I get? KD On Tuesday, May 22, 2018, 11:40:02 AM EDT, Alex Balashov wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:34:23PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: >  So append \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n as needed? No. Gramma

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread Alex Balashov
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:34:23PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: > So append \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n as needed? No. Grammatically, your options are either: append_to_reply("Contact: ;q=0.1\r\n"): append_to_reply("Contact: ;q=0.2\r\n"): ... Or: append_to_reply("Contact: ;q=0.1,;q=0.2,...\r\n

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread KamDev Essa
So append \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n as needed? KD On Tuesday, May 22, 2018, 11:18:20 AM EDT, Alex Balashov wrote: What do you mean by "engine"? You want to build a redirect server?   append_to_reply("Contact: \r\n");   sl_send_reply("300", "Multiple Choices");   exit; ? On Tue, May 22, 2018 a

Re: [SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread Alex Balashov
What do you mean by "engine"? You want to build a redirect server? append_to_reply("Contact: \r\n"); sl_send_reply("300", "Multiple Choices"); exit; ? On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:09:56PM +, KamDev Essa wrote: > Whats the best route to implement a basic 300 Multiple Choices response

[SR-Users] 300 Multiple Choices response engine

2018-05-22 Thread KamDev Essa
Whats the best route to implement a basic 300 Multiple Choices response engine. INVITE in 300 Multiple Choices out with choices in the response. I have a logic to generate my list choices, so a basic process would be better.  H ___ Kamailio (SER) - Use