Greetings Alex,
I know about the RFC and i don't think the issue here is with about the Uri
Comparison. The reason here is that a client is requiring this feature even
though the RFC doesn't requires it.
Best regards
A terça, 12/03/2019, 19:15, Duarte Rocha escreveu:
> Greetings,
>
> When i
Why would you want to do that? The spec is quite clear that an omission
of a port signifies 5060 for sip: and 5061 for SIP-TLS and sips:.
Although, interestingly, from RFC 3261 § 19.1.4 ("URI Comparison"):
A URI omitting any component with a default value will not
match a URI explicitly
