Re: [SR-Users] Last negative 5XX reply not getting relayed

2018-05-15 Thread Sergiu Pojoga
Thanks Federico, that did the trick! On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:48:11AM +0200, Federico Cabiddu wrote: > > > Hi, > > rfc 3261 (the one and only) states at section16.7 > > > > " > > A proxy which receives

Re: [SR-Users] Last negative 5XX reply not getting relayed

2018-05-15 Thread Alex Balashov
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:48:11AM +0200, Federico Cabiddu wrote: > Hi, > rfc 3261 (the one and only) states at section16.7 > > " > A proxy which receives a 503 (Service Unavailable) response > SHOULD NOT forward it upstream unless it can determine that any >

Re: [SR-Users] Last negative 5XX reply not getting relayed

2018-05-15 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Hi, rfc 3261 (the one and only) states at section16.7 " A proxy which receives a 503 (Service Unavailable) response SHOULD NOT forward it upstream unless it can determine that any subsequent requests it might proxy will also generate a 503. In other words,

Re: [SR-Users] Last negative 5XX reply not getting relayed

2018-05-14 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi, 1. Do you have a failure_route for this transaction? If so, can you provide it? 2. Make sure the `failure_reply_mode` modparam for TM is set to 3, which is default anyway: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.p.failure_reply_mode -- Alex On Mon, May 14, 2018 at

[SR-Users] Last negative 5XX reply not getting relayed

2018-05-14 Thread Sergiu Pojoga
Not sure if it's a default Kamailio behavior or something I'm doing wrong... When receiving a negative reply for an INVITE (more like in the 5xx range), proxy doesn't relay the message to the originator but instead issues it's own "500 Service Unavailable". That doesn't happen, from observations