[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Chaigneau, Nicolas via sr-users
needed to use append_branch before calling sl_send_reply to >> control the Contact headers in the reply. >> >> I tried to use "append_to_reply" instead to add the Contact headers, like >> this: >> append_to_reply("Contact: <...>\r\n"); >&

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Alex Balashov via sr-users
> > > -Original Message- > From: Chaigneau, Nicolas via sr-users > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 8:26 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Cc: Chaigneau, Nicolas > Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused"

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Chaigneau, Nicolas via sr-users
janvier 2024 15:44 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc : Chaigneau, Nicolas Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3) **This mail has been sent from an external source. Do

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Chaigneau, Nicolas via sr-users
INVITE: WARNING: [core/dset.c:690]: print_dset(): no r-uri or branches Regards, Nicolas. -----Message d'origine- De : Alex Balashov via sr-users Envoyé : vendredi 12 janvier 2024 13:44 À : Kamailio - Users Mailing List Cc : Alex Balashov Objet : [SR-Users] Re: Using http_asy

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Ben Kaufman via sr-users
branches > > Which is also why I was confused... > You're telling me I should not create branches... but if I don't, I get these > messages. > > Could you please clarify ? > > > Thanks a lot. > > Regards, > Nicolas. > > > -Message d'origine- &

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Alex Balashov via sr-users
nch before calling sl_send_reply to >> control the Contact headers in the reply. >> >> I tried to use "append_to_reply" instead to add the Contact headers, like >> this: >> append_to_reply("Contact: <...>\r\n"); >> >> This wo

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Chaigneau, Nicolas via sr-users
age d'origine- De : Alex Balashov via sr-users Envoyé : vendredi 12 janvier 2024 13:44 À : Kamailio - Users Mailing List Cc : Alex Balashov Objet : [SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamail

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Alex Balashov via sr-users
> Could you please clarify ? > > > Thanks a lot. > > Regards, > Nicolas. > > > -Message d'origine- > De : Alex Balashov via sr-users > Envoyé : jeudi 11 janvier 2024 18:57 > À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Cc : Alex Balashov > Obje

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-12 Thread Chaigneau, Nicolas via sr-users
don't, I get these messages. Could you please clarify ? Thanks a lot. Regards, Nicolas. -Message d'origine- De : Alex Balashov via sr-users Envoyé : jeudi 11 janvier 2024 18:57 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc : Alex Balashov Objet : [SR-Users] Re: Using http_asy

[SR-Users] Re: Using http_async_query - transaction seems "reused" for subsequent SIP INVITE requests received ? (Kamailio 5.7.3)

2024-01-11 Thread Alex Balashov via sr-users
Hi, First off, a bit confused as to why you are appending a branch and then sending a final reply? Adding a branch only makes sense if you plan to fork the request to an additional destination, instead of responding to the sender with a final dispositive (>= 3xx) reply. -- Alex > On 11 Jan