[SR-Users] Route Header based routing for initial INVITE

Hi Experts, I believe the loose_route() in kamailio can be used for initial Out of the dialog INVITE processing as well. Is that the correct understanding? If so, the request will be forwarded ahead to the destination corresponding to the Route Header remaining (if any) after Kamailio has

[SR-Users] Route header

Greetings, Is there a difference for Kamailio between these 2 situations. 1 - Method with 2 Route Headers, each one with one address and one uri 2 - Method with 1 Route Header that includes 2 Route URI Best Regards, Duarte Rocha ___ Kamailio (SER) -

Re: [SR-Users] Route header in local reply

Sorry, figured out, the question is not relevant. >Понедельник, 7 мая 2018, 20:29 +03:00 от Евгений Голей : > >Hi. > >Colleagues write how to configure the local responses to requests so that the >response added the header of the Route in accordance with the record-route

[SR-Users] Route header in local reply

Hi. Colleagues write how to configure the local responses to requests so that the response added the header of the Route in accordance with the record-route headers that were in the request ? Example SBC --> Kamailio REGISTER sip:domain.com SIP/2.0 Record-Route: