Hello,
ok, thanks for testing. I backported to 5.3 as well.
There seemed to be an issue with the size of the variables used to
match. Just for reference, I typically use $shv(x) variables these days
if I need to set some value via rpc and test it in config, it is more or
less like gflags, but
Hi Daniel,
Yes it's worked! Thank you very much for the quick response :)
Cheers,
Yufei
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 15:59, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> try with the patch from commit:
>
> *
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/5411eda4e44a487479d00433583a68a328aca9a3
>
>
Hello,
try with the patch from commit:
*
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/5411eda4e44a487479d00433583a68a328aca9a3
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19.03.20 15:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> can you try:
>
> kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag i:1024
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 19.03.20
Hello,
can you try:
kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag i:1024
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19.03.20 12:12, Yufei Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got some problems with is_gflags:
> 1. Set the gflag:
> # kamcmd cfgutils.set_gflag 1024
> 2. Check the gflags - fine:
> # kamcmd cfgutils.get_gflags
> 0x400 (1024)
> 3. Check
Hi,
I got some problems with is_gflags:
1. Set the gflag:
# kamcmd cfgutils.set_gflag 1024
2. Check the gflags - fine:
# kamcmd cfgutils.get_gflags
0x400 (1024)
3. Check using is_gflag - problem:
# kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag 1024
FALSE
Seems is_gflag always returns FALSE somehow. Calling function
