Hello,
On 23.10.17 08:56, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 08:52:46AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>> what version of kamailio are you using in this case? Later versions of
>> kamailio should not set a broken header in that case (no header with
>> invalid
Hello,
On 13.10.17 21:53, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a bizarre problem caused by bad UA behaviour:
>
>UA A ---> Kamailio (P) ---> UA B
>
> 1. UA A sends initial INVITE through P to B;
>
> 2. Kamailio (P) makes some modifications to the From header using
> uac_replace_from()
Hello,
I've got a bizarre problem caused by bad UA behaviour:
UA A ---> Kamailio (P) ---> UA B
1. UA A sends initial INVITE through P to B;
2. Kamailio (P) makes some modifications to the From header using
uac_replace_from() and passes along to B.
3. B sends an in-dialog request (e.g. BYE
