Re: [SR-Users] I think I found issue to Kamailio not forwarding ACK sent to it by Asterisk

Hi, if you have Kamailio listening on private IP and public IP you need two record-routes. Have a look at this param of the rr module: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/rr.html#rr.p.enable_double_rr Best regards, Federico On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:01 PM, Wilkins, Steve

Re: [SR-Users] Charging support/protocol information in Kamailio

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018, 15:10:27 CEST schrieb amit Kumar: > Could you please provide the charging related Information in Kamailio. ie > list of Charging protocol/standard Kamailio Support ??. As per the kamailio > modules(ims modules) , Kamailio support Diameter.Is there any other >

[SR-Users] I think I found issue to Kamailio not forwarding ACK sent to it by Asterisk

Hello All, When Kamailio sends a '200 OK' to Asterisk, it is putting its Public IP into the Record-Routes. In Asterisk 14.6, it would send the 'ACK' back to the Private IP Address of Kamailio, but Asterisk 15.x is using the Public IP Address that Kamailio placed in the Record-Routes so...

[SR-Users] Charging support/protocol information in Kamailio

Hi All, Could you please provide the charging related Information in Kamailio. ie list of Charging protocol/standard Kamailio Support ??. As per the kamailio modules(ims modules) , Kamailio support Diameter.Is there any other standard/interface Kamailio support.?? Thanks, amit

[SR-Users] Supper confused on Kamailio with Asterisk Call

Hi All, I am using Kamailio 5.2 and Asterisk (14.6 & 15.x) and I am having a very strange issue. If I use Asterisk 14.6, the call (WebRTC<=>WebRTC) works perfectly. However, if I use Asterisk 15.x, the call drops in 30 seconds. In comparing tcpdump files, the first place I see a difference

[SR-Users] Cannot get rid of following errors, and wondering if this is causing some of my issues

ERROR: [core/pvapi.c:1452]: pv_printf(): no more space for spec value ERROR: [core/pvapi.c:1461]: pv_printf(): buffer overflow -- increase the buffer size... I have pv_buffer_size=16384; tcp_rd_buf_size=16384; Any ideas? Thank you, ___

Re: [SR-Users] I think I found issue to Kamailio not forwarding ACK sent to it by Asterisk

Hello, I set that double route to ‘2’ and Kamailio still not hearing traffic coming in from Public. I think I need to figure out how to get Kamailio to set the first RR in the ‘200 OK’ to its Private IP, because the Server Kamailio is on may not be open to public traffic. Thank you From:

Re: [SR-Users] Is it possible to change a positive (2xx) response to a negative one (4xx) during kamailio processing of a reply (g711 fallback drama)?

I know, but I'm that desperate. On 21 May 2018 at 22:17, Alex Balashov wrote: > I think this is the wrong job for Kamailio. > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:16:20PM +0300, George Diamantopoulos wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I've been hitting a wall in getting T.38

Re: [SR-Users] Is it possible to change a positive (2xx) response to a negative one (4xx) during kamailio processing of a reply (g711 fallback drama)?

Theoretically speaking though, and notwithstanding any FDA restrictions on this, would it be possible to collect the cow's milk, process all lactose out with event_route[network:msg] and then distribute to undiagnosed intolerant consumers? I guess no one will encourage me to go through with that,

[SR-Users] Is it possible to change a positive (2xx) response to a negative one (4xx) during kamailio processing of a reply (g711 fallback drama)?

Hello all, I've been hitting a wall in getting T.38 fallback to G.711 to work in a specific case, and I was wondering if I could use kamailio to the rescue, since all my other endeavours have failed miserably. In short, this is this the scenario where I need to have this manipulation happen: -

Re: [SR-Users] Is it possible to change a positive (2xx) response to a negative one (4xx) during kamailio processing of a reply (g711 fallback drama)?

I think this is the wrong job for Kamailio. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:16:20PM +0300, George Diamantopoulos wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been hitting a wall in getting T.38 fallback to G.711 to work in a > specific case, and I was wondering if I could use kamailio to the rescue, > since all my

Re: [SR-Users] Is it possible to change a positive (2xx) response to a negative one (4xx) during kamailio processing of a reply (g711 fallback drama)?

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:28:06PM +0300, George Diamantopoulos wrote: > I know, but I'm that desperate. Sometimes you just have to solve the problem differently. Can't put the milk back into the cow. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920

Re: [SR-Users] I think I found issue to Kamailio not forwarding ACK sent to it by Asterisk

Not sure I understand your scenario. How many interfaces your kamailio has? How's the callflow going? Public->Kamailio->Asterisk? Did you have a look on "advertise" parameter of core "listen" directive? https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.1.x/core#listen Best regards, Federico On Mon, May

Re: [SR-Users] I think I found issue to Kamailio not forwarding ACK sent to it by Asterisk

What is actually happening is – I M USING Kamailio 5.2 with Asterisk 14.6 and 15.3. Asterisk cannot reach Kamailio on Public IP (Per design) Asterisk 14.6: If Asterisk sends an ‘INVITE’ to Kamailio (on Private IP), then Kamailio sends back a ‘200 OK’ with its Public IP in both Record-Routes.