Re: [SR-Users] Question about sip call setup : three-way handshake

2017-06-21 Thread Abdoul Osséni
Yes, I think PRACK method can help me. Thanks. Regards Abdoul. 2017-06-21 14:20 GMT+02:00 Mititelu Stefan : > Maybe PRACK, RFC 3262, is what you are looking for? > > --- > Stefan > > On Jun 21, 2017 2:46 PM, "Abdoul Osséni" wrote: > >

Re: [SR-Users] cpl.load

2017-06-21 Thread Ginhoux, Patrick
Hi, This may help : http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.0.x/modules/cplc.html#cpl.r.load 5. RPC Commands 5.1. cpl.load For the given user, loads the XML cpl file, compiles it into binary format and stores both format into database. Name: cpl.load Parameters: · username

Re: [SR-Users] maybe found a bug in TM module - how to proceed?

2017-06-21 Thread Valentin Christoph
Thank you! I have opened issue "wrong callback type after asynchronous SAR to HSS (distinct PSI) #1160". Greetings, Christoph From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:15 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List ;

Re: [SR-Users] Question about sip call setup : three-way handshake

2017-06-21 Thread Mititelu Stefan
Maybe PRACK, RFC 3262, is what you are looking for? --- Stefan On Jun 21, 2017 2:46 PM, "Abdoul Osséni" wrote: Hello, During three-way handshake (SIP call setup - INVITE-200 OK - ACK) and before generating or sending the final 200 OK call, is there a way to confirm

[SR-Users] Question about sip call setup : three-way handshake

2017-06-21 Thread Abdoul Osséni
Hello, During three-way handshake (SIP call setup - INVITE-200 OK - ACK) and before generating or sending the final 200 OK call, is there a way to confirm the caller is still available (no network issue)? I want to detect broken connections (ex. the uac uses 3G network) before

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS NAT issue: PRACK/ACK RURI changing in P-CSCF

2017-06-21 Thread Mojtaba
Hi, You mean that we should use either SBC or Proxy-CSCF (don't both of them) as entry point of IMS network? Is it right? Thank. Mojtaba Esfandiari.S On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Carsten Bock wrote: > Hi, > > There is a common scenario, where Kamailio needs to be in

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS NAT issue: PRACK/ACK RURI changing in P-CSCF

2017-06-21 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, There is a common scenario, where Kamailio needs to be in front of e.g SEMS: PCRF Integration for QoS. You need to access the IP of the sender and the SDP. You would have to integrate that into SEMS, but if you do, you can actually drop Kamailio as a Proxy-CSCf completely... Thanks, Carsten