Hello,
even with log on console I do not get anything yet.
[root@pabxmodelo ~]# /usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio.pid -m 64 -M 8
-u kamailio -g kamailio
loading modules under config path: /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/
Listening on
udp: PUBLIC_IP:5060
Aliases:
udp:
Hi all!
Some time ago Chromium browser sets rtcpMuxPolicy: required by default
(soon on Chrome 58)
It means that webRTC based clients not accepts
a=rtcp:31757
And uses for RTP and RTCP multiplexing at one port
Main trouble that i found: calls between original SIP client and webRTC
client (SIP
Hello,
I've got a bizarre problem caused by bad UA behaviour:
UA A ---> Kamailio (P) ---> UA B
1. UA A sends initial INVITE through P to B;
2. Kamailio (P) makes some modifications to the From header using
uac_replace_from() and passes along to B.
3. B sends an in-dialog request (e.g. BYE
Hi all,
I have the following scenario:
Client -> Kamailio (adds X-CallSource hdr) -> Media Server -> Kamailio
(removes all "X-" headers) -> Carrier
Carrier doesn't get any X- headers. All works.
Now for example, if the media server replies with a non-OK status, like:
Client -> Kamailio
Hello,
In my script I've had to test for the user=phone parameter in URIs. I
thought uri_param() from siputils would be handy for this operation on the
RURI, so I did:
if ( !uri_param("user","phone") ) {
add_uri_param("user=phone");
}
Unfortunately this wouldn't work (uri_param
Hi,
indeed, when a function returns with 0, Kamailio immediately ends the
processing of the packet. So that's why the unlock statement is never
executed.
I am wondering, why you are using locks at this point. That way, only
one REGISTER can be processed at the same time, since they all share
the
Hi, community!
I have in my Kamailio script following block (while REGISTER processing,
after auth succeed):
.
/* Save to usrloc */
lock("LOCATION_LOCK");
if (!save("location")) {
unlock("LOCATION_LOCK");
sl_reply_error();
