Re: [SR-Users] kamailio wiht PJSIP IOS client

Hello, I think you’re better off posting on the pjsip mailing list. In the meantime you could share the SIP traces for both SDP offers and explain the network setup. Cheers David On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 01:48, Gaurav Bmotra wrote: > hi > i na using kamailio 5.1.2 and i m developing ios

Re: [SR-Users] IMS strange behaviour

update : i can see drop packets on both icscf, scscf using dropwatch tool many like this : 2 drops at tpacket_rcv+55 (0x81845045) 2 drops at ip_rcv+d7 (0x817932f7) 9 drops at tpacket_rcv+55 (0x81845045) 3 drops at tpacket_rcv+55 (0x81845045) 8 drops at

[SR-Users] [DMQ] Sync DLG_STATE_CONFIRMED_NA dialog state ?

Hello, We are using DMQ module to sync dialogs between 3 Kamailio boxes. We are using last Kamailio version (5.2.3). >From our understanding, the state DLG_STATE_CONFIRMED_NA is not synced over >DMQ

[SR-Users] IMS strange behaviour

Hello list i'm facing strange behavior in my lap which consists of p-cscf, i-cscf, s-cscsf, FHoSS for HSS Registration is ok and ICSCF is performing well but when it comes to calls, INVITE Call between two ims users is not passing from scscf to icscf the flow should be : P-->S-->I-->hss i can

Re: [SR-Users] install mongoDB module with kamailio-cli doker image

hi did you update kamailio-cli image for mongoDB thank you On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 7:09 PM Gaurav Bmotra wrote: > thanks for reply > i have create feature > https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1995 > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 6:31 PM Sergey Safarov > wrote: > >> Could you open feature

[SR-Users] kamailio 4.4.4 fills IPv6 contact address when sending packet over IPv4

Hi! I detected strange problem that sip.linphone.org refuse to accept presence information re-transmitted by kamailio 4.4.4 server. I debug this problem with tcpdump and I found out that problem is in kamailio which fills IPv6 address into UDP datagram and that datagram is sent via IPv4 socket

Re: [SR-Users] Late offer ACKs not passing through branch_route

Hi Daniel, thank you. I will add a special case for ACKs in the request route. Cheers, Enrico. Il giorno mar 25 giu 2019 alle ore 16:46 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < dan...@kamailio.org> ha scritto: > Hello, > > the ACK doesn't get through the branch_route block because it is forwarded > in

Re: [SR-Users] ATCF/ATGW functionality

According to ETSI TS 129-280 V15, Your network must support Sv interface between MME to MSC. Your network infrastructure (EPC) should support this feature. So it is not intuitively related to PCSCF or SBC. Add external MSC server for what? Each 2g/3g network have it's MSC and it would be support