hi
i would need to replicate behaviour of refresh watchers command at
mi_datagram module in an ipv6 system. but in such system i am not able to
bind this module in an iov6 address desoite its doc claims is possible
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/presence.html#idp21723212
Hello,
The source address is correct: 192.168.0.31. I see it in tcpdump and
also in sngrep.
Thank you,
Leonid
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:02 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> when you look at the network traffic 9e.g., with ngrep, sngrep, ...)
> what is shown as source address for
Hello,
when you look at the network traffic 9e.g., with ngrep, sngrep, ...)
what is shown as source address for outbound leg?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08.07.19 19:21, Leonid Fainshtein wrote:
> I just found Daniel's response to a similar question (ref.:
>
I just found Daniel's response to a similar question (ref.:
https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2019-February/104853.html):
"check the routing rules/table of the operating systems, there should be
some differences between the two servers.
If you mhomed=1 and an unexpected interface is
Hi,
you can find the presentation as videos on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCElq4JNTPd7bs2vbfAAYVJA
Best Regards
Markus
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:48 PM Denys Pozniak
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Where can I find fresh presentation files from the KW 2019?
>
> PS. Nothing here:
Hello!
Where can I find fresh presentation files from the KW 2019?
PS. Nothing here: https://www.kamailio.org/events/
--
BR,
Denys Pozniak
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Hi,
I am trying to create an identity with permanent location in my system
using kamctl ul add command. Usually i have no issue doing that in IPv4
,example
kamctl ul add mcpttcontrolling sip:mcpttcontrolling@127.0.0.1:5070
it is OK
However when i do that using an IPv6 address i get following
Hello Kamailions,
I have been able to get the presence configured, subscribers see the status of
their subscriptions, this is working fine, for internal, incoming external and
external calls. This was solved by enabling use_pubruri_avps in the
pua_dialoginfo module.
Now I want to be able
Great, thanks Henning! That was something pretty much left behind till
the release days, it's a good reference to point at!
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08.07.19 13:00, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have updated the „new in devel” features document in our wiki.
> Pretty amazing stuff
Hello,
I have updated the "new in devel" features document in our wiki. Pretty amazing
stuff already in for the upcoming 5.3.0:
* 5 new modules
* Changes in 32 existing modules
* Many changes in core, API refactoring and tools
* About 1000 commits from 62 authors (development
Hi Martin,
I have implemented DTLS inside my open source -and closed source- code
years ago.
Obviously, not being used by anyone, this code is almost never tested. I
can tell that
it worked in labs years ago and I don't think it was ever used in
production by any one
that I know.
To test on a
Hi, (repost in plaintext)
I haven't found anything that follows up on that expired draft, except in
the sips: rfc5630 section 3.1.4 that appears to explicitly preclude UDP.
My issue is that a draft of BS8521part2 mandates TLS over UDP, and the
closest I can see is sip-dtls over UDP but I'm
Hi,I haven't found anything that follows up on that expired draft, except in the sips: rfc5630 section 3.1.4 that appears to explicitly preclude UDP.My issue is that a draft of BS8521part2 mandates TLS over UDP, and the closest I can see is sip-dtls over UDP but I'm struggling to find a clear
Hello,
putting such conditions in the config file is possible, but if you have
more than those listed user ids, probably is better to keep them in a
database.
Anyhow, for doing the conditions in the config file, you can use the
variable $rU (r-uri username) and $rd (r-uri domain) as well as $fU
Hello,
there was no progress on SIP-DTLS in Kamailio. I haven't seen any sip
phone/app supporting it, are you aware of such ones?
Also, the draft you refer to is expired since 2008. Is there a follow up
on it or an RFC based on it?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 07.07.19 14:16, Martin Meadows wrote:
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
