t of view based on call-id, but there are still chances that on
multi-cpu systems the packets read from the network can get to be processed in
different order because of how read on udp sockets is done by kernel/libc and
how cpu scheduler allocate cycles to running application processes.
>
Hi,
I have experienced out of order packet processing when testing a simple
Kamailio config.
The configuration is as follows, basically:
request_route{
record_route();
enum_query();
xlog("INVITE ENUM query - To URI $tU");
forward();
}
I saw
back at the TCP/TLS transport level.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 9:35 PM Jawaid Bazyar wrote:
Hi,
I have experienced out of order packet processing when testing a simple
Kamailio config.
The configuration is as follows, basically:
request_route{
record_route();
enum_qu
ctor in modern computing.
[2] Where it exists. An established call (200 OK + e2e ACK, no BYE yet)
will actually not have any transaction state, since all transactions involved
in establishing it have been terminated and no further transactions, e.g. to
hang it up, have been created.
I have the following basic script:
request_route{
record_route();
$var(enumres) = enum_query();
switch( $var(enumres) ) {
case -1:
xlog("enum_query lookup failure - To URI $tU");
Hi,
I am exploring different redundancy / load-balancing models for a Kamailio
cluster.
When I say cluster, I mean, a number (N) of Kamailio nodes acting as stateful
proxies.
Each node is configured the same as the others, and all have access to the same
lookup data to make routing
r - how does it work?
On Dec 13, 2022, at 10:09 PM, Jawaid Bazyar wrote:
That is working, however, on subsequent messages in the dialog (e.g., ACK,
INFO, BYE) the proxy tries the failed destination for each message. Eventually
it gets to the right place, but, is there a way to delete the failed
desti
Hi Alex,
That is working, however, on subsequent messages in the dialog (e.g., ACK,
INFO, BYE) the proxy tries the failed destination for each message. Eventually
it gets to the right place, but, is there a way to delete the failed
destination from the XAVP so this doesn't happen? Or just to
ust hashing over a stable part, e.g. the from URI? Then the
dispatcher would distribute the second INVITE with authorization information to
the same asterisk again.
Cheers,
Henning
-Original Message-----
From: Jawaid Bazyar mailto:baz...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2023 0
aves differently in
this regard. Have you tried plain round-robin (i.e. #4)?
> On Mar 13, 2023, at 6:59 PM, Jawaid Bazyar <mailto:baz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe it would be easier to explain my expectations on how it's supposed to
> work, and th
ttps://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.p.ds_probing_mode>
Cheers,
Henning
-Original Message-
From: Jawaid Bazyar mailto:baz...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Montag, 13. März 2023 14:33
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List mailto:sr-users@lis
Hi,
For what it's worth, I am successfully using Path with Asterisk+pjsip ..
endpoint registers through Kamailio to Asterisk;
asterisk remembers path;
asterisk uses path when dialing endpoint with Dial(PJSIP/endpointid)
You have to enable a setting "support_path" ="yes" in the endpoint
Hi, is this expected behavior?
I have two target hosts in a dispatcher set, 10.20.20.118 (prio 5) and
10.20.20.252 (prio 10).
When I have 10.20.20.252 turned off, dispatcher still tries to send packets to
that host, even when the status flags are IP.
mode", 1)#Keeps pinging gateways
when state is known (to detect change in state)
On 3/12/23, 8:28 PM, "Alex Balashov" mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Unless you have auto-probing enabled, yes.
> On Mar 12, 2023, at 9:14 PM, Jawaid Bazyar
/kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.p.ds_probing_mode
<https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.p.ds_probing_mode>
Cheers,
Henning
-Original Message-
From: Jawaid Bazyar mailto:baz...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Montag, 13. Mär
Hi,
This bug seems to have affected ‘trunk’ endpoints; In my testing ‘user’
endpoints seem to work, as noted in the bug.
From: Alex Balashov
Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:19 PM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Hi,
Can DISPATCHER be used in conjunction with ENUM?
E.g., to avoid sending requests to SIP destinations that are returned by ENUM,
but, which DISPATCHER knows are down?
Thanks,
Jawaid
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List -
Hi,
I have an application as follows:
Multiple Kamailio Nodes
Shared Postgres database
Auth information will be stored in DB and accessed with Authdb.
Here is the behavior I seek:
I would like all the Kamailo nodes to cooperate in updating the database, each
updating data as
Hi,
I have a scenario where I have an edge proxy (named RS), which locally stores
registrations from Endpoints in its USRLOC, but which then also forward's
REGISTER requests on to another proxy (named CN), which stores registrations in
its USRLOC. (which then does DMQ with another CN like
AM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Cc: Jawaid Bazyar
Subject: RE: Registrar / Path
Hello,
I probably failed to understand your scenario completely.
But basically, if you want to just forward REGISTER message from one Kamailio
to the other, you can us
rapezoid where the
> registrar is reached indirectly through an intermediate proxy.
>
> It may be the case that you're doing something in a roundabout way that
> routes around the simpler, "baked in" scenarios Kamailio is prepared to
> handle...
>
> -- Alex
>
that you're doing something in a roundabout way that
> routes around the simpler, "baked in" scenarios Kamailio is prepared to
> handle...
>
> -- Alex
>
>> On 27 Oct 2023, at 10:23, Jawaid Bazyar via sr-users
>> mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Well I guess the other effects if any are unclear.
As to what I want..
The goal is to ensure that all the nodes in a large-scale
geographically-distributed system have routing information to locate the
dynamic contacts of registered endpoints.
This requires that information to be
Hi,
This is one of the effects I was remembering:
" For example NAT pinging is a killer since during each ping cycle all nated
contact are loaded from the DB;"
On 10/20/23, 9:17 AM, "Jawaid Bazyar" mailto:baz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Well I gues
a location service vertically and separating into a
different layer from the stuff that needs to scale horizontally.
On 10/20/23, 11:16 AM, "Alex Balashov" mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2023, at 09:17, Jawaid Bazyar <mailto:baz...@gmail.com
Hi, I am trying to register an endpoint as follows:
REGISTER sip:siptest.booger.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP X.X.X.X.76:31114;branch=z9hG4bK223420485;rport
From: sip:1720...@siptest.booger.net;tag=962873337
To: sip:1720...@siptest.booger.net
Call-ID:
Hi Henning,
I’m a numbskull – I was editing the wrong config file.
Thanks for your help!
Jawaid
From: Henning Westerholt
Date: Friday, November 17, 2023 at 3:01 AM
To: SRList SRList via sr-users
Cc: Jawaid Bazyar
Subject: RE: auth_check : sip user / authentication user
Mahmood, are you paying for that resource in something like AWS? That would
be big $$$!
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 11:38 AM Mahmood Alkhalil via sr-users <
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> The cost saving that will be the main reason before licenses is the amount
> of hardware resources
Hi Mahmood,
I think FOSS often trades licensing/purchase costs for operational costs.
Sure, the software is "free" but because such software is rarely an exact
fit for your use case off the shelf, you have to spend time (money) to:
customize for your operation
integrate into other operational
In addition to the other comments, you will have the same issue with
conference rooms, if you support that.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:45 PM Social Boh via sr-users <
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm using Kamailio to balance SIP request between two Asterisk. I have a
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
