[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio v5.6.3 Released

, or they might be an issue with the packaging. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com -Original Message- From: Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 2:24 PM

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio v5.6.3 Released

Hi, It appears that the Kamailio version 5.6.3 has not been automagically built for the CentOS 7/8/9 operating systems on the pulp repositories at https://rpm.kamailio.org. Any chance we could kick that off please? Thanks On 11/01/2023 11:59, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v5.6.2 Released

Hi Sergey, Thank you, much appreciated! Cheers, On 09/10/2022 09:25, Sergey Safarov wrote: Hello Danie, Asgaroth I found my mistake in the automatic publishing configuration and fixed it. The next release should be published after 2 hours after the release is tagged on GitHub

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v5.6.2 Released

Hi, Just an update, I don't see v5.6.2 on the rpms site for CentOS 6, 7, 8, 9 http://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/7/5.6/ http://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/8/5.6/ http://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/9/5.6/ http://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/6/5.6/ Does something manual need to be kicked off? Thanks On

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v5.4.0 RPM Availability

2FtYWlsaW8ub3Jn) > dnf install kamailio > > To team. > How about officially start to use rpm.kamailio.org > (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/e6a0627c-32f0-42a0-a708-6765561fb...@getmailspring.com/4?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Frpm.kamailio.org=c3ItdXNlcnNAbGlzdHMua2FtYWlsaW8ub3Jn)? > >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v5.4.0 RPM Availability

p://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/kamailio.repo > > dnf install kamailio > > > > To team. > > How about officially start to use rpm.kamailio.org > > (http://rpm.kamailio.org)? > > > > Sergey > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:54 PM Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.

[SR-Users] Kamailio v5.4.0 RPM Availability

Hi all, I would just like to check in and find out if/when the Kamailio v5.4.0 rpm's will be available on the OpenSUSE build service. Thanks to all involved for all the hard work in this new release! Thanks There are two major products that came out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe

[SR-Users] SCA: sca_call_info_bye_handler: no in-use callee appearance for BYE

Hi All, I've just started playing with the SCA module and am encountering an issue whereby SCA cannot seem to find an in-use appearance for the BYE message. From my limited understanding of SCA, the module, in this case, appears to be trying to track the state of the call using callid as

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua and lua_run parameter count

t be given as string. An example with max number of params: lua_run("lua_funcx3", "$rU", "2", "$si"); Cheers, Daniel On 13.08.18 12:50, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, Quick question with regards the lua_run function in app_lua module. The documentation for v5

[SR-Users] app_lua and lua_run parameter count

Hi All, Quick question with regards the lua_run function in app_lua module. The documentation for v5.0.x states: "Execute the Lua function 'func' giving params as parameters. There can be up to 3 string parameters. The function must exist in the script loaded at startup via parameter 'load'.

Re: [SR-Users] is_method not matching message type KDMQ breaking DMQ bus. (master branch)

, not sure. On 31/07/18 18:08, Joel Serrano wrote: Hi Asgaroth, I'm using dmq and I haven't seen a msg get passed this:     # Handles DMQ messages     if (is_method("KDMQ")) { dmq_handle_message();     } That said, just to make sure it's not some work-in-progress happening on master br

[SR-Users] is_method not matching message type KDMQ breaking DMQ bus. (master branch)

Hi All, I've come across and oddity whereby my is_method("KDMQ") checks are not matching. I'm testing with kamailio master: version: kamailio 5.2.0-dev6 (x86_64/linux) a16272 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,

Re: [SR-Users] JSON RPC Error: LUMP_RPL_BODY already added!

spatch();     } else if ( $var(xhttp_uri) =~ "^/http_rpc") {     dispatch_xhttp_rpc();     } else {     xhttp_reply("200", "OK", "text/html", "Wrong URL $hu");     }     return; } Fixed the issue, sorry for the noise :) On 06/06/18 15:47, Asgarot

Re: [SR-Users] JSON RPC Error: LUMP_RPL_BODY already added!

Hi, I performed the following: # kamcmd dbg.trace on # curl --header 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data-binary '{\ "jsonrpc": "2.0", \ "method": "ul.lookup", \ "params": [ "location","u...@example.com"], \ "id": 3 }' http://registrar.example.com/rpc # kamcmd dbg.trace off And the

Re: [SR-Users] JSON RPC Error: LUMP_RPL_BODY already added!

module and see what actions are executed in that situation? Cheers, Daniel On 17.05.18 18:22, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, We are trying to query the json rpc server on our registrar for the contact of an aor, but we are seeing the following error(s) being displayed in the log when we query

Re: [SR-Users] NatHelper's Keep-alive timeout behind proxy

On 17/05/18 14:23, Daniel Tryba wrote: I noticed the same problem (most important with multiple registrars I didn't like paritioning logic) and my solution was to send my own OPTIONS. We have it running with multiple (3) registrars that replicate with dmq usrloc, works perfectly so far for

Re: [SR-Users] Updated NAT traversal article

Alex, Thank you for this blog post, great work, very helpfull information! Much appreciated. On 11/05/18 15:13, Alex Balashov wrote: Hi, I have updated this article with some other topics: http://blog.csrpswitch.com/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the-definitive-guide/ "The

[SR-Users] NatHelper's Keep-alive timeout behind proxy

Hi All, We are looking to enable nathelpers keepalive timeout parameter where it will remove an aor's contact if it doesn't receive a reply from the ua. The problem we have is that our registrar's are seperated from our proxies, so this means nathelper is sending options messages via the

Re: [SR-Users] Auth module with shared "secret"

On 11/05/18 13:47, Daniel Tryba wrote: This works with all auth params set to default. My guess the following are the cause of problems. modparam("auth", "nonce_count", 1) modparam("auth", "one_time_nonce", 1) Thanks for the pointer Daniel, I'll take a look in the comming days and report

Re: [SR-Users] Auth module with shared "secret"

Hi All, Does anyone have any thoughts on how I can debug this further, I'm currently stumped as to what steps to take to see why these messages are failing authentication. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks On 03/05/18 11:02, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, I am testing a scenario where we

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route and received/rport parameters

Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com <mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com>> wrote: This would not work if I dont have access to the proxy that is advertising a private address in the record-route header, thanks for the tip though. On 03/05/18 15:26, Amar Tinawi wrote: You m

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route and received/rport parameters

this way : listen=private ip  advertise public ip On Thu, May 3, 2018, 4:52 PM Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com <mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi All, I've come accros a scenario where a proxy is sitting on a private address range and inserts a record-rout

[SR-Users] Record-Route and received/rport parameters

Hi All, I've come accros a scenario where a proxy is sitting on a private address range and inserts a record-route specifying the the private address. This causes issues whereby the BYE to an INVITE attempts to relay to the private address defined in record-route. I was wondering, if we

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ and/or Database for dialogs, registrations, etc..

Is that available in stable 5.0.x / 5.1.x or is it only available in master branch? On 03/05/18 12:28, Charles Chance wrote: Hi, On Thu, 3 May 2018 at 11:22, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com <mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Charles, With regards presence, a

[SR-Users] Auth module with shared "secret"

Hi All, I am testing a scenario where we have 3 proxies and I'm trying to ensure that if a messages comes in to 1 proxy, which challenges the ua, is able to be auth'd successfully on one of the remaining 2 proxies if, for some reason the ua decides to send the response to one of the remaining

Re: [SR-Users] SUBSCRIBE NAT Keep-Alive

Hi, On 15/11/2017 07:59, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, you have presence server configured as a different address in client than the register? Currently our setup is a proxy server in front of 3 registrar servers and a seperate, single, presence server. On the proxy we forward

[SR-Users] SUBSCRIBE NAT Keep-Alive

Hi All, I'd like to ask the guru's out there their opinion on how to solve the nat problem for presence subscriptions. We have an issue with subscriptions that get timed out and the notify clears the subscription out of the active_watchers table due to the notify timing out, I think this is

Re: [SR-Users] AVPOPS: is_avp_set/avp_check "name" parameter as variable.

variable, maybe you can try like: $avp(x) = $_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm); then: is_avp_set("$avp($avp(x))") or: if($avp($avp(x))!=$null) If it is not in pair with avpops, then avp module won't be removed. Cheers, Daniel On 10.11.17 17:00, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, I was having a read of the

[SR-Users] AVPOPS: is_avp_set/avp_check "name" parameter as variable.

Hi All, I was having a read of the AVP module documentation and I see mentioned that in future releases of kamailio that the AVP module may become deprecated in favour of using AVPOPS module. To this end, I started looking to switch some of AVP functions over to AVPOPS functions when I cam

Re: [SR-Users] NatHelper ignoring force_socket module parameter

Hi All, Just to continue on on this particular issue, we are now testing kamailio v5.0.3 and I are still experiencing the same issue. We run 3 registrar servers which run with user location "in-memory" (db_mode 0). These registrar's are configured to replicate registrations using the