[SR-Users] Via header line missing

2018-09-07 Thread Karlheinz Knapp
Hi, hm the only reason why I'm playing with kamailio is that it should be able to translate IPv6 from customer phones behind Fritz!Box (NAT) to IPv4 used by the provider (which is not able to handle IPv6). But it looks that he accept in general the packet with 2 Via lines (also with IPv6 as

[SR-Users] Via header line missing

2018-09-06 Thread Karlheinz Knapp
Hi, of course kamailio is listening on IPv4 and IPv6. Register coming from IPv6 and goes out on IPv4: REGISTER sip:sip.ggew-net.de SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 217.113.176.155;branch=z9hG4bK98fc.314c428d232717f129932376c83e2c02.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP

[SR-Users] Via header line missing

2018-09-05 Thread Karlheinz Knapp
Hi, we want to use kamailio as a IPv6 to IPv4 proxy. IPv4 to IPv4 bridging with NAT works. If we come from an IPv6 address, the registration packet is send via IPv4 to the provider. He answers with 401 Unauthorized and one Via line in the header. On the IPv6 side was no Via line in the packet.

[SR-Users] Ipv6_to_ipv4

2018-09-04 Thread Karlheinz Knapp
i have tested the sample config from: https://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:kamailio-mixed-ipv4-ipv6 i found that i can register with v4 to kamailio and to the provider if i user ipv6 to kamailio and ipv4 to provider i canĀ“t register. the packet from the provider contain a via entry which is missing

[SR-Users] IPv6 2 Ipv4

2018-08-30 Thread Karlheinz Knapp
Hi i serach for a config to convert IPv6 to ipv4. My Provider give me only IPv4 and i have 4000 Customer which have ipv6. Anybody have expierience and a running config ? ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org