To anyone reading this in the future: Point 2 in my original post is
completely misleading:
> If there are two destinations in the destination group for first_provider,
> and the first one fails, then the second destination will be tried out in
> tm:branch-failure:DISPATCH_FIRST_PROV_FAILOVER.
Hello Daniel,
Thanks for the input. That clears it up.
@Ben Merrills: Glad to hear my rants are useful to other people as well
:-). Branches are indeed among the more complicated concepts in kamailio
scripting. I've always found resources that explain how things work much
more useful than
Hello,
a new branch is created every time a request is sent out to a new
destination or resent to same destination after additional processing in
a failure route. append_branch() should not be needed, unless you want
to create more branches for parallel forking. Updating $ru or $du and
doing
I would put these in an $xavp array and iterate through them in a
failure_route.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:09:51PM +0200, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to accomplish the following scenario, and some questions have
> been raised during testing: I'd like to be able to
Hello all,
I'm trying to accomplish the following scenario, and some questions have
been raised during testing: I'd like to be able to fork serially to a
number of downstream destinations in case of failure, but also try several
hosts which are available per destination network before failing
