On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:25:57PM +0100, Loic Chabert wrote:
> ACK messages are in the same INVITE transaction ?
No, e2e ACKs are a transaction in their own right.
However:
(a) They will have the same CSeq number as the INVITE to which they
correspond;
(b) They are a bit "special" in that th
If i check my ACK messages sent from my LB to my proxy, to Route headers is
present. So my ack has not been forwarded to my SBC. So i can't route all
subsequent INVITE messages without using dispatcher for ACK messages.
ACK messages are in the same INVITE transaction ?
My SBC is asterisk, and doe
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:14:18AM +0100, Loic Chabert wrote:
> Thanks Daniel,
>
> Your snippet code must be used in proxy/registrar or on LB ?
It's for the loadbalancer. The registrar also is a near default supplied
config, only added support for Path to be used for REGISTERs and
dispatcher.
>
Thanks Daniel,
Your snippet code must be used in proxy/registrar or on LB ?
The proxy/registrar should follow the same behaviour with the SBC and the
lb ? Loose_route every request from sbc and dispatch request from lb to sbc
?
Regards.
2018-01-30 10:51 GMT+01:00 Daniel Tryba :
> On Tue, Jan 3
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:22:39AM +0100, Loic Chabert wrote:
> I have a setup configurered has diagram below:
>
> UAC -> Proxy LB (proxy lb) -> Proxy Router/registrar (proxy B) -> Asterisk
> SBC
>
> My UAC is SIPP and sending a classic call scenario: INVITE - ACK - BYE.
>
> But i have some trou
Hi list,
I have a setup configurered has diagram below:
UAC -> Proxy LB (proxy lb) -> Proxy Router/registrar (proxy B) -> Asterisk
SBC
My UAC is SIPP and sending a classic call scenario: INVITE - ACK - BYE.
But i have some trouble to understand which queries should be loose routed
and which que
