Hello Daniel
Yes i can also do that :)
Thanks for your input !
-Message d'origine-
De : sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org] De la part de Daniel
Tryba
Envoyé : mardi 1 août 2017 18:11
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Usleep on Repl
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:40:56PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> I think it will not match because I want to send a "180" in case I receive a
> 183 without SDP and no 180 from the carrier.
...
> I tried to delay the processing of the "183" and :
>
> If a 180 is received before the delay expi
ists.kamailio.org] De la part de Alex
Balashov
Envoyé : lundi 31 juillet 2017 23:23
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Usleep on Reply
Importance : Haute
Hi Nicolas,
The sleep functions block an entire SIP worker thread, of which there is a
small number. While it
Hi Nicolas,
The sleep functions block an entire SIP worker thread, of which there
is a small number. While it's blocked, new incoming SIP messages will be
picked up by other SIP workers. You can read more about how this works
here (shameless plug, it's my article):
http://blog.csrpswitch.com/tuni
Hello All,
I'm trying to code something on the on_reply part to do something if I receive
a 183 ( Session in progress ) , followed immediately by a "180"
I tried to sleep 1 second the 183 and recheck if I received before a 180 but
seems the "sleep" function sleeps everything ( also the receive
