On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:24:34AM -0400, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> In an ideal world, DNS is, as you said, the easiest of approaches one can
> think of. However, not all endpoints support [properly] SRV failover.
And that is why you do both. Both a hot standby and multiple active
OK, thanks for all these details!
Cheers,
Daniel
On 30.10.19 22:03, Ilie Soltanici wrote:
> Well... For Kamailio, at the moment ProxySQL is mainly used for
> routing and statistic. For Asterisk, we also use a little caching. For
> other services, ProxySQL is also used as a "Gateway", because our
Well... For Kamailio, at the moment ProxySQL is mainly used for routing and
statistic. For Asterisk, we also use a little caching. For other services,
ProxySQL is also used as a "Gateway", because our DB Servers are working in
a separate Network. Before we were using db_cluster module from
Hello,
thanks for sharing!
Is ProxySQL making any difference using it instead of direct connection
to MySQL? Curious mainly if you use it for caching capabilities, or just
routing sql...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29.10.19 22:34, Ilie Soltanici wrote:
> We are using keepalived with virtual IP Address
We are using keepalived with virtual IP Address for Kamailio, dispatcher
module for Asterisk, 2 MySQL Databases master-master replicated and 2
Servers with ProxySQL.
So far so good.
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Hi Daniel,
In an ideal world, DNS is, as you said, the easiest of approaches one can
think of. However, not all endpoints support [properly] SRV failover. Take
for example Asterisk's chan_sip. Is does resolve the hostname by SRV,
however the failover is proven/accepted as broken.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:03:09AM +0100, Youssef Boujraf wrote:
> I am looking for failover service of kamailio servers looks like
> haproxy but udp & tcp.
>
> -??one domain name : sip.secure.com pointing my public ip address.
> - two kamailio server pointing same database content (user,
Hello,
it is for SIP over TCP/TLS.
Check the next link to see if the ha solution described there suits your
needs:
-
https://www.kamailio.org/w/2015/11/kamailio-ha-with-ansible-corosync-and-pacemaker/
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28.10.19 06:03, Youssef Boujraf wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have seen in
Dear All,
I have seen in the new kamailio release 5.3.0, kamailio support for haproxy
protocol – both the v1 (human-readable) and v2 (binary) versions of the
protocol are supported (
https://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-v5-3-0-release-notes/ ) but it seems to be
for Database, webserver
