Hello,
can you paste here the sip message and the result of the substitution?
It will help to troubleshoot if is something wrong there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 4/27/10 2:35 AM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Hello All,
Correction, it seems both the last supplied regex and xlog("L_INFO",
"[$ci] m=aud
2010/4/24 Iñaki Baz Castillo :
> 2010/4/24 Andreas Heise :
>>
>> Hello Iñaki,
>>
>> did you fixed your issue? I'll also connect an OmniPCX pbx which maintain
>> the session
>> after forward / transfer and would be interested in a working config example
>> for the
>> SR/RTPproxy part. OmniPCX SIP co
2010/4/28 Uriel Rozenbaum :
> Iñaki,
>
> Maybe you can try with 2 masks that are not 32.
> example:
>
> Entry 1:
> - grp = 1
> - ip_addr = 9.9.9.128
> - mask = 25
>
> Entry 2:
> - grp = 2
> - ip_addr = 9.9.9.0
> - mask = 24
>
> And then verify if the order or id matters. But as per Juha
Iñaki,
Maybe you can try with 2 masks that are not 32.
example:
Entry 1:
- grp = 1
- ip_addr = 9.9.9.128
- mask = 25
Entry 2:
- grp = 2
- ip_addr = 9.9.9.0
- mask = 24
And then verify if the order or id matters. But as per Juha's comment, the
result can be unpredictable.
Maybe we an
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> However after checking the module code it seems that there are just
> two cases:
> - IP addresses (mask = 32).
> - Subnets (mask != 32).
>
> So first the source address is always matched against he address hash,
> and if it doesn't match then it is matched aga
Hi, some time ago I asked if allow_source_address_group() gives
preference to the entries in 'address' table with lowest mask. I was
replied that such case is not analyzed.
But the fact is that in my tests it just works:
Entry 1:
- grp = 1
- ip_addr = 9.9.9.9
- mask = 32
Entry 2:
- grp =
2010/4/28 Juha Heinanen :
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
>
> > Is there any bug or different behavior in LCR in openser 1.2? or do I
> > miss something?
>
> inaki,
>
> there may be a bug in 1.2, but the version is too old in order to be
> supported by me anymore.
Ok, I just wanted to ask if it's a