Re: [SR-Users] SIP routing problem when kamailio uses 2 interfaces

2010-08-26 Thread Klaus Darilion
I think you have multiple issues: (not sure if I am right as I have to guess your network setup) 1. If Kamailio is an Application Layer Gateway between the public and the internal network, then of course Asterisk should listen only on the internal interface. Thus in sip.conf add:

[SR-Users] Error when integrate xmpp module to Kamailio 3.0.1

2010-08-26 Thread Quốc Huy Nguyễn
Hi all, I have some problem when integrate module xmpp to Kamailio 3.0.1. I have already searched on google and mailing-list but can't find the right way to fix it. I install Kamailio 3.0.1 on server 192.168.1.25 (kamailio1.com), Ejabberd on server 192.168.1.21 (ejabberd.com). Here the

Re: [SR-Users] help to configure RTP stream with NAT.

2010-08-26 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/8/26 truong ngoc THANH ngoc217th...@yahoo.com: hi, my diagram is : sip client -- nat -- kamailio server -- nat -- sip client (something like that). you said that i can use RTP tunnel solution(as RtpProxy ?). I hope that kamailio handle signaling protocol and media stream go direct from

[SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 - Dispatcher priority usage

2010-08-26 Thread Geoffrey Mina
Hello, I have a question about the priority in the dispatcher module. I looked in the docu-wiki and there was nothing which actually described how this field is used (exactly), so I can only guess or ask the list. Say I have 3 destinations in a set: set: 1 dest: sip:1.2.3.4:5060 priority: 1

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 - Dispatcher priority usage

2010-08-26 Thread Geoffrey Mina
OK, so In my scenario this wouldn't achieve what I am looking for. I basically want 2 servers to get all the round-robin requests unless they are unavailable. Then I would want the lower proiority servers brought into the mix. Maybe ill take a look at the source to see how tough this would be.

[SR-Users] LCR prefix based

2010-08-26 Thread inge
Hi, I'm still disapointed after reading the documentation of LCR module. I use SER 0.9.9 and I'm wondering if it's possible to use LCR based on destination prefix ? I mean that if I call 056X I want to use GW1. For 06 I want to use GW2, etc. Thank you for your opinion. Regards,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 - Dispatcher priority usage

2010-08-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 8/26/10 4:47 PM, Geoffrey Mina wrote: OK, so In my scenario this wouldn't achieve what I am looking for. I basically want 2 servers to get all the round-robin requests unless they are unavailable. Then I would want the lower proiority servers brought into the mix. Maybe ill take a look at

Re: [SR-Users] LCR prefix based

2010-08-26 Thread Alex Balashov
No, but custom DB logic can be enacted to make this happen relatively easily. You will probably want a newer version of SER, though. On 08/26/2010 12:12 PM, inge wrote: Hi, I'm still disapointed after reading the documentation of LCR module. I use SER 0.9.9 and I'm wondering if it's

Re: [SR-Users] LCR prefix based

2010-08-26 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 26 August 2010, inge wrote: I'm still disapointed after reading the documentation of LCR module. I use SER 0.9.9 and I'm wondering if it's possible to use LCR based on destination prefix ? I mean that if I call 056X I want to use GW1. For 06 I want to use GW2, etc. Hi

Re: [SR-Users] LCR prefix based

2010-08-26 Thread inge
Thanks all for your answers. It's not so simple to update and bring the configuration into sr3 config file. But this is a supplementary argument in favor of this update. Thanks. Le jeudi 26 août 2010 à 18:25 +0200, Henning Westerholt a écrit : On Thursday 26 August 2010, inge wrote: I'm