[SR-Users] about syn_branch

2011-03-07 Thread Juha Heinanen
we noticed that if sr 3.1 config does not contain syn_branch=0 then acks to 200 oks that are t_relayed by sr, contain branch=0 param in topmost via. in kamailio 1.5, via branch param has proper value even when tm param syn_branch is not set. a couple of questions: 1) according to core

Re: [SR-Users] Balancing Asterisk

2011-03-07 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 3/7/11 12:51 AM, Andy Lippitt wrote: Hello all, I've read as many of the asterisk balancing threads as I can find. Either my situation is unusual or I simply haven't understood anything I've read. In short, I'm building an web/phone mashup which uses Asterisk's AGI to get its

Re: [SR-Users] about syn_branch

2011-03-07 Thread Jiri Kuthan
On 3/7/11 9:50 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: we noticed that if sr 3.1 config does not contain syn_branch=0 then acks to 200 oks that are t_relayed by sr, contain branch=0 param in topmost via. in kamailio 1.5, via branch param has proper value even when tm param syn_branch is not set. What is

Re: [SR-Users] How to access additional xavp's

2011-03-07 Thread Alex Hermann
On Sunday 06 March 2011, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: it took me quite a while due to traveling, but now the issue should be fixed on git. Indeed there was an issue with the indexes when accessing the xavp as PV. Thanks for the fix, they work fine now. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alex

Re: [SR-Users] about syn_branch

2011-03-07 Thread Juha Heinanen
Jiri Kuthan writes: What is proper value? jiri, according to rfc3261 section 20.42: For implementations compliant to this specification, the value of the branch parameter MUST start with the magic cookie “z9hG4bK”, as discussed in Section 8.1.1. it is sad if sr is not BY DEFAULT rfc3261

Re: [SR-Users] about syn_branch

2011-03-07 Thread Jiri Kuthan
On 3/7/11 10:40 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: see above. we have seen rfc3261 sip user agents that don't understand branch=0 value That's probably good enough argument, as some newer implementations may give up on RFC2543 backwards compatibility and complaing about lack of branch. and matching

Re: [SR-Users] Limit call duration

2011-03-07 Thread Hans Goossens
Hello Joe, Thanks for your response. Setting $dlg_ctx(timeout_bye) = 1 did the trick. One more question: after the session is ended, the following line is printed: WARNING: dialog [dlg_req_within.c:173]: inconsitent dlg timer data on dlg 0xb368c954 [1975:901494976] with clid

[SR-Users] ACK not sent and rr-enforced

2011-03-07 Thread Dominguez Jover, Ricardo
Hi everybody. I am using Kamailio 3.1 and RTP proxy for internet calls. I'm using external test accounts to check if the calls are established and the media flow is ok. When I use a sip2sip.info or VoIP Talk accounts, then all is working fine between my internal and these external

[SR-Users] Siremis Installation - Hangs at Database Configuration Page

2011-03-07 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings- I'm attempting an installation of Siremis on a CentOS 5.5 64-bit system running Kamailio 3.1.0. Following the instructions on the wiki [1], I find that I cannot pass step 3 for the database configuration. I've triple checked all of my details are correct and verified the permissions

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.0.4: dispatcher module request

2011-03-07 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, sorry for the delay... it was a busy week. I have just commited a change to the current master branch so that you may call ds_mark_dst(a) in a reply route. Setting the gateway to active will now also reset the failure counter. I have adapted the docs accordingly. Please feel free to test...

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher confusion

2011-03-07 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, i have just changed the functionality in the master branch: If we get a positive reply from the OPTIONS-Request and the destination has been deactivated, it should now no longer become active again, only the error-counter will be set to zero. I will do some tests in the next few days...