Hello,
On 9/15/11 11:54 AM, Vitaliy Aleksandrov wrote:
Hi,
Tnx for a fix, t_newtran is working fine with UAC and i don't see any
problems with AVPs.
good than, thanks for testing and giving feedback.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello,
On 9/15/11 10:01 AM, CT Radu wrote:
Daniel,
The problem is that the asipto domain does not seem to be reachable
from almost any romanian ISP . I could cite you a few names, but is
irrelevant, as I, and others have tried to reach that site from
different locations, and different
Hello,
is this project maintained/actively developed? Last commit seems to be
like almost two years old.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/15/11 9:52 AM, CT Radu wrote:
Hi Henrik,
There is a project called The 3Gdb Home Subscriber Server (HSS)
They can be found at http://code.google.com/p/hss/ .
This
Hello,
On 9/14/11 6:13 PM, CaptWho wrote:
Thanks Timo, I'll look into that, just have to figure out what you just said.
:confused: I'm at the bottom of the learning curve and I got dumped into
this after the guy that was dealing with it disappeared.
it will help also to watch the sip signaling
Hello,
On 9/14/11 2:41 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
Another funny thing I encountered lately is this:
Client sends INVITE via kamailio (via dispatcher) to sems, gets back
100/200, sends another couple of INVITE with same CSeq (looks like
retransmissions), gets back more 200, then sends ACKs
My architecture is described below:
TDM device--- Call
server[IPv4]---[IPv4]Kamailio[IPv6][IPv6]Asterisk-[IPv6]Linphone
* *
*
**
*
* *
Thanks for your email Marius.
Could you please explain in a little more detail how to compile Kamailio
with debug symbols?
Do i use the command make CFLAGS=-g ?
then make QUIET=no all?
Thanks again for your assistance!
Regards
Phillip
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:02 PM, marius zbihlei
On 16.09.2011 12:00, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote:
Could you please explain in a little more detail how to compile Kamailio
with debug symbols?
Do i use the command make CFLAGS=-g ?
then make QUIET=no all?
I always add mode=debug to make, e.g.:
make mode=debug my other make options
HTH,
Thanks for your response Timo.
so you say i should try:
make mode=debug [CFLAGS=-g]?
Thanks for your assistance.
Regards
Phillip
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Timo Reimann timo.reim...@1und1.de wrote:
On 16.09.2011 12:00, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote:
Could you please explain in a little
Does Kamailio use lazy evaluation in if expressions?
Like
if ($var(a) == 2 $var(b) ==3) { ... }
then $var(b) == 3 is only evaluated if $var(a) == 2 is true
--
Morten Isaksen
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
Hello
I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as
being active when in fact the call has already been completed long ago and
this is giving wrong number of concurrent calls on our SNMP work station
(CACTI) when polling the data from Kamailio. I realized this only
Hey Phillip,
On 16.09.2011 13:35, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote:
Hello
I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as
being active when in fact the call has already been completed long ago
and this is giving wrong number of concurrent calls on our SNMP work
station
Hi Timo
Thanks for the update!
Regards
Phillip
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Timo Reimann timo.reim...@1und1.de wrote:
Hey Phillip,
On 16.09.2011 13:35, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote:
Hello
I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as
being active when in
Hi,
On 09/16/2011 09:10 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
It's actually an educated guess that this could be related to wt_timer,
but I don't know what else it could be.
what happens is that when transaction is active and tm is handling the
replies, they are forwarded using the same socket
Me again,
On 09/16/2011 02:46 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
And this is what I'd need to add if I got you right:
# the default reply route used when transaction is already gone
onreply_route
{
if(reply from inside)
force_send_socket(localhost);
else
force_send_socket(public
On 15.09.2011 10:44, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote:
When the time for 3.2 (master branch at the moment) comes, I'll add Wheezy
support. Not sure about Ubuntu distro support. Should we add support to Ubuntu
11.10 or wait until the lts 12.04 is released?
I found it always very confusing that there
you have to use the 'r' flag:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/rtpproxy.html#id3024166
klaus
On 16.09.2011 11:42, Loïc Fofana wrote:
My architecture is described below:
TDM device--- Call
IIRC (there was a similar thread years ago): yes
On 16.09.2011 13:20, Morten Isaksen wrote:
Does Kamailio use lazy evaluation in if expressions?
Like
if ($var(a) == 2 $var(b) ==3) { ... }
then $var(b) == 3 is only evaluated if $var(a) == 2 is true
Dear All,
I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat
traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and relay
server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in case of
Symmetric NAT
Regards
___
STUN alone is not 100% sufficient, only ICE+TURN is reliable. Thus, only
if all your clients support ICE+TURN then you can drop rtpproxy.
klaus
On 16.09.2011 16:47, Mikael Williams wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat
traversal to drp the
ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN) manually
in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to peer calls between
2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All my VOIP customers supports
STUN/TURN but without ICE
One more thing: I would like to ask how
Hey Phillip,
after looking closer at what has been reported to me initially, your
case may be different after all.
Could you possibly use kamctl fifo dlg_list to check what state the
majority of dialogs that should be terminated in your opinion are in?
Being given the reference counter should be
22 matches
Mail list logo
