Re: [SR-Users] cached $TV is 0 in failure route

On 22.03.2012 15:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 3/22/12 11:08 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Hi! Is this by design? I would expect it to be either the same value as in the request route, or even better to be calculated new every time it enters the failure route. $TV(...) takes

Re: [SR-Users] cached $TV is 0 in failure route

One more question, do you have lot of traffic there, or is testing with few clients? Cheers, Daniel On 3/23/12 8:58 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: On 22.03.2012 15:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 3/22/12 11:08 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Hi! Is this by design? I would expect it

Re: [SR-Users] memory allocation failure while reading ca_list

btw, the devel branch as well as last stable releases are compiled with memory debugger on, you can compile with F_MALLOC and try to see if you get some improvements, but I guess they will not be really relevant over all. Cheers, Daniel On 3/19/12 4:04 PM, Jan Janak wrote: I know this is

Re: [SR-Users] Relaying message to Recent contact list...

Hello, On 3/22/12 6:36 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote: Thanks Daniel. I found your posting four years ago about saving one contact per user http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/2008-October/016273.html and used save(location, 0x04). However, I noticed a problem with this. The contact is

Re: [SR-Users] to tag not correctly inserted in rtpproxy command with kamailio 3.2.2

Hello, can you get latest version from git branch 3.2 and try again? It was a fix for timeout socket, but it broke the issue you reported. I hope is fixed properly now: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=2357e54ecfba7a86b993e5a0e864fd232e1730ba Let us know

Re: [SR-Users] Accessing #!define variables from within lua

Have you considered using selectors/cfg_get variables instead? They are also a common way to store various types of global values/constants, with the difference that they can be accessed at run time using PV container functions instead of set at preprocessing. myproject.local_ip = 1.2.3.4

Re: [SR-Users] Accessing #!define variables from within lua

I'll check this option out, thanks for the tip Alex. I guess the other option too, which I have not tried, is to possibly pass in the values as lua script parameters. On 23/03/12 12:12, Alex Balashov wrote: Have you considered using selectors/cfg_get variables instead? They are also a

[SR-Users] Search all dialogs - Kamailiio 3.0.3

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could offer any advice please. We are using the dialog module and need to be able to find out whether another dialog exists within a particular profile and having a specific value, so that we can send the new call to the same gateway. As far as I am aware,

Re: [SR-Users] modify FROM field in the failure_route block

Please upgrade to latest stable and try again Why? If you have to ask it, than you didn't got it... new version === new functionalities 99% of list support and tips are based on last stable version. 1.3 is pretty old... Edson. Em 23/03/2012 10:06, Robert R escreveu: Hi, Even though

Re: [SR-Users] modify FROM field in the failure_route block

I am going to have to go with the upgrade crowd in this one. Running OpenSER 1.3 at this point is like running a libc5-based Linux distro. Almost no advice or discussion is relevant to it because there have been such tectonic, generational shifts since. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste

[SR-Users] TLS delay on request processing

Hi list, I use Kamailio 3.2.2 as TLS=TCP gateway this is working well, but if I create some traffic by SIPP then Kamailio response time increase with every new call, seems to be that Kamailio process call by call. I made a test with 30caps then after ~200calls Kamailio need ~3s to response an

Re: [SR-Users] memory allocation failure while reading ca_list

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: Maybe we can improve a bit in the way that if there are same ca_list and crl path, to load once and do references from the other profiles. I don't know if there is lot of coding, but should be kept in mind for future optimizations. Perhaps could be added in

Re: [SR-Users] CRLF Error with tcp_crlf_ping

Hello, Yes it is sending CRLF after the second CRLF from client. Another thing is, Kamailio would send CRLF even if the second CRLF come after few seconds. I believe we don't have any way to drop it ? Thanks Jijo On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com

Re: [SR-Users] cached $TV is 0 in failure route

Thanks. I did some tests and it seems to work now. regards Klaus On 23.03.2012 13:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Can you try with patches: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=cf9269d7315e2965dcb57afda7838c4a5d3ad807

[SR-Users] 2 rollover contacts per user

Hi, Is there a way to set up maximum of 2 active roll over contacts per user? Currently when I setup max contacts param as 2, The third one is responding with 503 error for 3rd Register. How can we remove one of the contacts and replace it with the new one. I need it when the device is switching

Re: [SR-Users] modify FROM field in the failure_route block

So, what's the best link for upgrade kamailio on Ubuntu? thanks, R On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.comwrote: I am going to have to go with the upgrade crowd in this one. Running OpenSER 1.3 at this point is like running a libc5-based Linux distro. Almost

[SR-Users] ITSPA 2012 Award for Open Source VoIP Projects

Hello, ITSPA UK has unveiled the winners of its 4th annual Awards, an event designed to celebrate innovation and best practice in the VoIP industry: * http://www.itspaawards.org.uk/ Open Source VoIP Projects won a special category this year, Members' Pick, for providing a real value to

[SR-Users] Authentication on loose_route();

Hello, Should I be requiring users to authenticate before letting them into loose_route(); ? What about anonymous calls from E164, how do I authenticate these calls after they have started? Thanks, David ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and

Re: [SR-Users] Authentication on loose_route();

Clearly, you can only authenticate sequential requests corresponding to calls whose initial requests were subject to authentication. If the initial request was not authenticated, there is no reason to believe that the endpoint would support authentication of sequential requests. As to whether