Hey Guys,
Not sure if important, but what I noticed is that the latest debian
stable as well as latest 33 packages, they both install still kamailio
3.3.0. In order to get 3.3.1 I needed to use nightly build packages.
Is this what is desired?
Thanks,
DanB
El Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:35:05 +0200
DanB danb.li...@gmail.com escribió:
Hey Guys,
Not sure if important, but what I noticed is that the latest debian
stable as well as latest 33 packages, they both install still kamailio
3.3.0. In order to get 3.3.1 I needed to use nightly build packages.
Hi All,
Does Kamailio has a mandatory requirement for SIP Invite to have Route
header? Although RFC-3261 doesn't have.
My requirement is to take out route header from the client if I do that I
don't see PRACK being send out from Kamilio to Media GW which causes call
drop eventually in 15sec. Any
Hi,
Though not an expert, I got few things in mind for your case. In the
upgrade process the modules folder remain the same ? right ! if that is so
is there any chances that the new installation skipped installation of
newer rtpproxy module and hence the old version rtpproxy module could've
been
://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120816/919fdda5/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:45:57 +0200
From: Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Is Route Header in SIP Invite Mandatory?
To: SIP
Hello guys,
Why I can only append_branch() a SIP URI as a literal constant string? Why
not from a pseudovariable? It's the same for most of the core functions.
My intention is to do something like this:
append_branch($cnx3a(route1));
t_relay();
where cnx3a is a variable containing the SIP
Hello,
On 8/16/12 5:25 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
Hello guys,
Why I can only append_branch() a SIP URI as a literal constant string?
Why not from a pseudovariable? It's the same for most of the core
functions.
My intention is to do something like this:
append_branch($cnx3a(route1));
Hello,
On 8/14/12 11:14 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Daniel,
One question I do have - is the $timef(%Y%m%d) evaluated only once
at run time (when kamailio is started) - or is it evaluated at the
time of the ACC'ing action.
it is evaluated at runtime.
Cheers,
Daniel
Sincerely,
Hello,
the module is working with phones having an AT modem for sending SMS.
You can set debug=3 in the config file and send the output here to
investigate, in case you don't understand exactly what happens.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 8/14/12 5:10 PM, Oleksandr Shchirskyi wrote:
Hi,
I'm using
Hello,
I am experiencing some disconnections with my VOIP phones.
Let me explain:
My server is an Asterisk + Kamailio in a datacenter with a fixed IP, and a
bridge firewall in front of it, so no NAT here.
My client (several offices) have usually no problem when they have a fixed IP,
but
Great! I'll give it a try.
Thanks!
Carlos.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 8/16/12 5:25 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
Hello guys,
Why I can only append_branch() a SIP URI as a literal constant string?
Why not from a
Looks like km_append_branch() doesn't have all of the signatures that the
original append_branch() has. I can't add q values for serial/parallel
forking with km_append_branch().
Also, apparently there's no way of setting the RURI by calling a function
that does that. I guess I'll have to do it
On 8/16/12 9:15 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
Looks like km_append_branch() doesn't have all of the signatures that
the original append_branch() has. I can't add q values for
serial/parallel forking with km_append_branch().
What signature are you looking for?
Also, apparently there's no way
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/16/12 9:15 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
Looks like km_append_branch() doesn't have all of the signatures that the
original append_branch() has. I can't add q values for serial/parallel
forking with
14 matches
Mail list logo
