[SR-Users] kamailio 4.0.1 websocket support

Dear All, I have build and installed kamailio 4.0.1 from source(tarball release) in Cent Os 5.8 in i386 machine.I can start kamailio but when i want to connect kamailio using SipMl5 client which uses sip over websocket the client can't connect with the server.I am attaching my

Re: [SR-Users] Simulating kamailio config flows

2013/5/23 Victor Seva linuxman...@torreviejawireless.org: 2013/5/23 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: - update the interpreter to use pv cache instead of own spec per pv (I can do it, being in my list and hopefully is no big change) I will try to do it myself just to get familliar

Re: [SR-Users] Simulating kamailio config flows

Hello, right direction, but maybe the change is not required everywhere or maybe inside some functions, you have to analyze where is pvar and where is ser-style avp. Cheers, Daniel On 5/24/13 9:22 AM, Victor Seva wrote: 2013/5/23 Victor Seva linuxman...@torreviejawireless.org: 2013/5/23

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

Hello, On 5/23/13 5:47 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Hi Fabian! See http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/tls/testing-and-debugging for TLS debugging. fix_nated_contact() is old-style NAT traversal. It basically works, but is a bit intrusive and may cause problems with strict clients.

[SR-Users] Calls remain stuck in state 1

Hello, We are using dipatcher to limit the concurrent number of calls, problem is that from time to time  calls remain stuck in state 1 and it breaks our concurrent limits..I was not able to make a kamailio log with high debug as it happens randomly. Attached is a tcpdump flow: Conv.| Time    

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] SER Getting Started - what's the copyright and license?

Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013, 09:56:46 schrieb Olle E. Johansson: http://kamailio.org/docs/ser-getting-started/SER-GettingStarted.pdf I'm looking for the authors of this document to find out what license it is published under. It would be nice to be able to use it and update it instead of

Re: [SR-Users] misc_radius false error

Hello, Daniel-Constantin! I see attached two patches: docs.patch - some documentation changes functions.patch: + patch 'bout IPv4 (ipaddr) attributes + in radius_load_callee_avps/radius_load_caller_avps when common_response set 1, avp's set even in negative radius response (usable for

Re: [SR-Users] Calls remain stuck in state 1

Hello, 3.1 is rather old for dialog module, you should upgrade to more recent version because dialog got lot of work. The general hint is that you have to create the dialog as last operation before t_relay(). Cheers, Daniel On 5/24/13 11:05 AM, Giany wrote: Hello, We are using dipatcher

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Via header, branch parameter and syn_branch

Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013, 12:20:00 schrieb Henning Westerholt: [...] And should the next major release have a default of syn_branch=0? Since with syn_branch=1 the branch=0 version has been known to cause interop issues in the past (see below) and I can confirm the

Re: [SR-Users] LCR Module - Rule_id

Hi Juha, Many thanks, finally with lcr_id is ok. I make a few changes in my config and work ok. Cheers On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote: Eloy Coto Pereiro writes: Any solution to check the rule extra info. I want route billing info to put in the

[SR-Users] How does save(location) choose the subscriber

Hi, if I do save(location) when receiving REGISTER, what is the header which indicates the subscriber for which it will be registered ? $fu?$au?$tu? Thanks, Mino ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

Re: [SR-Users] How does save(location) choose the subscriber

On 05/24/2013 11:58 AM, Mino Haluz wrote: if I do save(location) when receiving REGISTER, what is the header which indicates the subscriber for which it will be registered ? According to RFC 3261, the To header (To URI) contains the AoR (Address of Record) that the UAC desires to register.