Re: [SR-Users] kamcmd vs kamctl

2013-06-04 Thread DanB
Hey Daniel, Thanks for the answer. It makes more sense now. Have a good one! DanB ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Postgres error - unknown field type: 2

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, there were some workarounds to store bigint as a string in avps, probably done in modules such as sqlops. The DB api itself supports this type, but the AVP can store inside only string or integer values. In this case, auth_db has to be updated to deal with this case. Cheers, Daniel

Re: [SR-Users] if (t_check_status(486|408))

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 6/1/13 10:30 PM, hiro wrote: I tried for multiple hours to operate the debugger, also looking at -ddd output at stdout for many days. But I'm none the wiser. voicemail works from route[location] (e.g. if extension is not registered), but not after late errors like busy while ringing.

Re: [SR-Users] if (t_check_status(486|408))

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 6/2/13 10:57 PM, hiro wrote: I'm still thinking about this issue and wondering: is it even compliant to the RFC to go directly from ringing to session progress and then OK? if I understand correctly what you mean, then it is ok from RFC point of view. Why you think would be a

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and Siremis

2013-06-04 Thread Elena-Ramona Modroiu
Hi Isaac, On 5/31/13 11:55 PM, Isaac A. McDonald wrote: Hello All, I'm a bit confused as to how Siremis interacts with Kamailio. From what I understand, the dial-plan is done in the kamailio.cfg with regex statements and requires a restart of the Kamailio process to take effect. How then

Re: [SR-Users] if (t_check_status(486|408))

2013-06-04 Thread hiro
At some point i got session progress and then loads of OKs back from freeswitch, but either the phone didn't receive or didn't accept it. the ringing tone would keep on playing in the phone instead. Randomly the session progress seems to still get processed by the phone, i would hear freeswitch

Re: [SR-Users] [Spce-user] FYI: Package update(s) in release 2.8

2013-06-04 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
Dear 2.8 users, this update includes the fixes for kamailio-lb config (multiple sockets-related): - added record-route param to store socket; review logic for relaying in-dialog requests (fallback to default send socket if it's not defined explicitly); fixed socket selection for ACK after 4xx and

Re: [SR-Users] [Spce-user] FYI: Package update(s) in release 2.8

2013-06-04 Thread Juha Heinanen
Andrew Pogrebennyk writes: Dear 2.8 users, this update includes the fixes for kamailio-lb config (multiple sockets-related): i would prefer to keep sr-users list to generic kamailio/sip router related messages. -- juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER)

Re: [SR-Users] kamcmd vs kamctl

2013-06-04 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Dan, You can also use the built in web provisioning interface: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/xhttp_pi.html You can build your own provisioning layout (you can preset fields) and also pre-validate data before pushing it into the database (like URI or socket type validation).

Re: [SR-Users] Freepbx 2.11.0rc1 with Asterisk 11.3.0 and Kamailio 4.0.1

2013-06-04 Thread Barry Flanagan
On 30 May 2013 21:09, Michael Leuker mich...@leuker.me wrote: Thank you so much for pointing me in the right direction! It was the missing alias. Now the extensions are working, but there's one more problem: When I call the PBX (echo-test) or from one extension to another, I get a hangup

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk 11.4.0+Kamailio 4.0.1 Integration

2013-06-04 Thread Barry Flanagan
On 3 June 2013 10:46, Ravindra Gowda ravin...@thrikasa.in wrote: Dear All, I am trying to integrate kamailio 4.0.1 server with Asterisk 11.4.0 in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS version. I tried it by using the following link : http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb

[SR-Users] simple way to access RR headers/uris and to remove them

2013-06-04 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi! Is there a simple way to: - retrieve the RR headers (or Route/Contact ...) and to - selectively remove them? E.g. retrieve 2 and delete 3 I do not want to care about the format, eg: Record-Route: 1, 2, 3 or Record-Route: 1 Record-Route: 2 Record-Route: 3 Thanks Klaus

Re: [SR-Users] dialog ka-timer/ka_interval results in flood op OPTIONS

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Monday 03 June 2013 20:54:41 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: can you try the patch from the commit linked next? - http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=a17a32e 5f7a3120c200d6e48fe91d7aa1dfd28b1 If all works fine, then I will backport. Impressions from 45m

Re: [SR-Users] if (t_check_status(486|408))

2013-06-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 12:07:35 hiro wrote: Sometimes it also seemed that kamailio was sending the INVITE to the phone instead of to freeswitch, or when i played around between changing $du or $ru the INVITE gets sends to freeswitch but with the wrong URI pointing to the phone instead of

Re: [SR-Users] simple way to access RR headers/uris and to remove them

2013-06-04 Thread Klaus Darilion
Finally I found it myself. For the records: To address a certain header (regardless if headers are in a single line or in separate lines) use the @hf_value select. The trick is to load the textopsx module (this select used to be in ser's textops module). Note, header names must use '_'

Re: [SR-Users] if (t_check_status(486|408))

2013-06-04 Thread hiro
ok. right now from tcpdump I can see the session progress and OK messages are sent to the correct ip:port of my phone, but either the phone doesn't receive it or it doesn't process it. I assume the problem to be the headers sent by freeswitch, and perhaps not changed appropriately by kamailio,

Re: [SR-Users] if (t_check_status(486|408))

2013-06-04 Thread hiro
actually, I now see my last message is wrong. I've compared the 200 OKs that gets sent from freeswitch to my phone after the busy error and after direct voicemail routing from LOCATION when user is offline. Both 200 OKs look the same with one exception: The one that doesn't work had nat=yes two